Leave a comment

Comments 29

discobeat December 7 2008, 20:45:35 UTC
LOLOLOLOLOL, I AM GOING TO DIE, I THINK I AM A "PRO-HOMOSEXUAL" LOL WTF
IDEK IF I AM READING IT CORRECTLY. MY BRAIN HURTS NOW!
OMGGGGGGGG HOW DOES SUCH STUPIDITY EXIST?

I will stop with the caps. :P

Reply

CAPS ARE ALWAYS WELCOME notacrnflkgirl December 7 2008, 20:49:28 UTC
WHY DOES EVERYONE THINK THAT ANTI-HOMOSEXUALS ARE IGNORANT, KATHERINE?

I JUST DON'T GET IT.

PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME THE SCIENTIFIC NATURE OF IT.

AND YOU BETTER BE A PRO-HOMOSEXUAL, OR WE ARE GOING TO BE HAVING A PROBLEM. :P

Reply


shinjiko December 7 2008, 21:22:20 UTC
THIS IMAGE, IT MAKES ME RAGE

Reply

notacrnflkgirl December 7 2008, 21:23:56 UTC
IT MAKES NO SENSEEEEEEEEE

Reply


peaceofpie December 7 2008, 23:06:51 UTC
i think the point is not about anti-homosexuals. the point is that a lot of glbtqqaixlmnopwxyz people are obnoxious and intolerant, too. the terminology obviously isn't the same we'd use for ourselves, but it's still a good point. and also, the flipside...that homophobes are people too...is a good point as well. just because someone is homophobic doesn't mean they're a horrible person and there's nothing good about them at all.

Reply

xenofox713 December 8 2008, 01:59:20 UTC
I agree with you. I think that's more of the point of what they are trying to say.

Reply

notacrnflkgirl December 8 2008, 03:19:19 UTC
They chose a pretty shitty way to say it.

Reply

xenofox713 December 8 2008, 04:00:13 UTC
Well yeah, and a pretty bad massacre of Raphael's painting too.

Reply


aisforalisha December 7 2008, 23:26:27 UTC
I'M 100% PRO-HOMO.

Reply

wakeuplovely December 7 2008, 23:46:14 UTC
me toooooo

Reply

notacrnflkgirl December 8 2008, 00:42:48 UTC
*High-fives*

Reply

notacrnflkgirl December 8 2008, 00:41:19 UTC
OH GOD, DID THEY GET TO YOU, TOO, ALISHA? D:

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

notacrnflkgirl December 8 2008, 20:44:46 UTC
LMAO, YES.

Two words: marital aids.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up