New page takeover ad type confirmed; ad FAQ consolidation; LiveJournal partners with AdNectar

Dec 12, 2009 12:15

marta (who I am ever grateful for) has confirmed that the Best Buy ad is an approved LiveJournal ad; however, there has been a change in the ad's presentation, in that it no longer automatically plays audio.

Additionally, Frequently Asked Question #265: What are LiveJournal's guidelines on acceptable ads? has been modified, as the Best Buy ad trips ( Read more... )

business deals, ad creep, flash ads, ad implementation, faqs about ads, sponsored virtual gifts, guidelines, ad placement, staff talking

Leave a comment

Comments 32

intrepia December 12 2009, 20:21:52 UTC
gameboyguy13, not gamebody13 ;)

Reply

foxfirefey December 12 2009, 20:24:08 UTC
I might start calling him that ALL THE TIME NOW.

...fixed, and thanks.

Reply

intrepia December 12 2009, 20:24:49 UTC
MAYBE WE WILL ALL START CALLING HIM THAT. :D

Reply


brewsternorth December 12 2009, 21:39:57 UTC
Goodish to know it wasn't a hijack; not so good to hear that they've essentially relaxed their rules. Granted, the internet has probably moved on somewhat since that FAQ was drafted, but it should've been re-examined and rewritten, not half-deleted.

Reply

foxfirefey December 12 2009, 22:32:57 UTC
I'm not sure I agree--the internet hasn't moved from those guidelines much for good internet properties and those guidelines were a fairly decent compromise between revenue and user experience. Interstitials are still considered lucrative but aggressive and offputting. Video ads work on video content, but not as well on text content, although people will accept user initiated ones.

I feel the interstitials are a short term gain, long term loss kind of move.

The short term gains:

* Immediate revenue from a high CPM ad property
* Encourages some more involved people to buy paid accounts

The long term loss:

* Drives away people who are less involved with LJ who aren't inclined or savvy enough to use ad block and don't feel like they need to put up with interstitials when they know more people on Facebook anyway.

Reply

soph December 14 2009, 00:37:14 UTC
SUP have found themselves in a vicious spiral though. They've already found themselves losing people; that's probably why they're trying ads that pay better. But by doing so they drive away even more people, which forces them to up their ad content even more, which... blah blah blah etc etc.

Reply

foxfirefey December 14 2009, 00:46:11 UTC
Maybe they don't mind driving away the uncommitted, if the ad is lucrative enough and some people are driven to buy paid accounts.

Reply


starlady38 December 12 2009, 22:00:17 UTC
That Best Buy ad got more "what! no! okay, I'm off LJ for the time being"-type posts on my friends list than any other feature I can think of. Which might be a double standard, given the predominance of that sort of ad on other sites (at many of which I happily tolerate them, in order to read the site), but...yeah. This definitely seems like something SUP would want to proceed with caution on.

Reply

foxfirefey December 12 2009, 22:33:27 UTC
Curious: Which other sites do you use with interstitials?

Reply

lady_ganesh December 12 2009, 22:35:51 UTC
Salon.com uses them pretty regularly.

Reply

foxfirefey December 12 2009, 22:40:44 UTC
Yeah, but as far as I know Salon.com is more of a premium content site, where they have paid writer's content instead of user generated content.

Reply


mlady_rebecca December 12 2009, 23:40:01 UTC
Noisy animated ads is what made me search out AdBlock Plus in the first place. I think allowing them is a bad move.

(For the record, I have a permanent account, so I'm not violating any rules.)

Reply


AdNectar justgoto December 13 2009, 07:32:44 UTC
So that is the inexplicable black screen I keep getting?

Reply

Re: AdNectar foxfirefey December 13 2009, 07:36:31 UTC
Nope, those are interstitial ads from admnt.com, if I remember correctly. They're for Best Buy. Sounds like they might be malfunctioning on your setup.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up