Leave a comment

Comments 6

schnee January 2 2007, 21:58:37 UTC
explementation?

Reply

ex_uniquewo January 2 2007, 22:07:00 UTC
LOL. I was thinking of "deplementation" but "explementation" sounds good too. It's... perkier. ;-)

Reply

schnee January 2 2007, 22:09:16 UTC
*s* Thanks. I was thinking about "disimplementation" or "deimplementation" first, or even the totally bland "feature removal" (although whether the word "feature" is appropriate here is probably debatable as well), but "explementation" seemed like a natural complement to "implementation. ^^

Reply


halfawake January 2 2007, 23:21:36 UTC
I don't think there is a single word antonym of implementation. "Phased out" is the best I can come up with on short notice.

Reply


Wat. foxfirefey January 3 2007, 00:33:02 UTC
I can't say I'm unhappy about this, because I figured it was the ONE feature that would help spur the Plus community's dismal adoption rate.

Also, if that's being removed, WTF is "" still in the head for communities!?

Reply

Re: Wat. foxfirefey January 3 2007, 00:34:45 UTC
Well, I guess the code push hasn't gone through yet is the probable reason--I'll have to wait after code push and see whether the comm_promo.css gets removed.

But I really do wish they'd remove unused CSS for stuff. I mean, communities that aren't sponsoring things don't need comm promo CSS. And Paid users don't need ad-based CSS. ETc.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up