The feedreader I currently use supports LJ's entry tags, adding a little plus sign next to any feed "name" that is utilizing them, and to display the tags list you just click the plus.
I've been using it for many months mostly for keeping track of web comics. I don't have too many complaints about it. Sometimes it screws up the unread count, but that may be a side effect of me having it upgraded so many times. I kinda wish it would automatically purge feeds too.
If you go to admin > items, you can tell it to purge items older than x days. I wish it would remember my choice and perform the purge automatically without me having to do tit manually through that page every time.
...using ?auth=digest (Which you can keep private, so their friended entries don't end up publicly displayed to the web!)
The word that concerns me here is can. Does that mean you have the choice of the feed being private or public, meaning that if someone doesn't select private, anyone can have access to the friends-only entries on their aggregated friends page? I don't typically FO posts, but I imagine a lot of people who do might freak out over this (if they found out about it).
If you use that format, it will automatically set the feed to private, so in order for it to end up public, someone'd have to make the feed public on purpose.
I don't typically FO posts, but I imagine a lot of people who do might freak out over this (if they found out about it).
Well, they can't disable syndication and none of the previous protests garnered them anything beyond synlevel...which isn't documented in the FAQs, so I guess they're a bit out of luck on this one. They'll have to ask their friends not to use external feed readers or defriend them or put them on a filter and maybe set synlevel to title only or something.
The wiki entry says "Gregarius will mark the feed as 'private'". So I assume it happens automatically and only the logged-in user can see it. But, yes, you totally could make it public and have google bot index everything. Then again, you could do this already by writing a simple script that publishes the contents of a ?auth=digest feed onto a web page.
Comments 20
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
The word that concerns me here is can. Does that mean you have the choice of the feed being private or public, meaning that if someone doesn't select private, anyone can have access to the friends-only entries on their aggregated friends page? I don't typically FO posts, but I imagine a lot of people who do might freak out over this (if they found out about it).
Reply
I don't typically FO posts, but I imagine a lot of people who do might freak out over this (if they found out about it).
Well, they can't disable syndication and none of the previous protests garnered them anything beyond synlevel...which isn't documented in the FAQs, so I guess they're a bit out of luck on this one. They'll have to ask their friends not to use external feed readers or defriend them or put them on a filter and maybe set synlevel to title only or something.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment