Wow, when it comes to our perceived infuence on publishers, we sure are a cynical bunch.
(The expanded version of my answer is that it depends on the publisher and on the fan, but given the either/or nature of the poll I thought 'false' was much closer to being the case than 'true.')
Transparently false to say "New Weird doesn't mean anything to anybody"; did anyone actually make this claim?
I don't think it was a marketing exercise, but i do think it was a clique-building exercise amongst authors; China and all the other cool kids got to be in the New Weird gang, away from all the smelly old modern fantasy writers.
Comments 17
Also; you (or anyone else) going to the signing thing at Waterstones Thursday?
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The expanded version of my answer is that it depends on the publisher and on the fan, but given the either/or nature of the poll I thought 'false' was much closer to being the case than 'true.')
Reply
So who would be a fan who has a lot of influence with a publisher?
Reply
Reply
Reply
I don't think it was a marketing exercise, but i do think it was a clique-building exercise amongst authors; China and all the other cool kids got to be in the New Weird gang, away from all the smelly old modern fantasy writers.
-- tom
Reply
Leave a comment