So, a couple of entries down, the subject of Mary Sues has come up. This is, admittedly, one of those "button" issues for me. So, I'm no doubt going to catch some heat for expressing my opinion of the issues surrounding Mary Sue here, as I know there are lots of vehement anti-Mary-Sue'ers out there
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Well, specifically, I was arguing against the use of that term to describe good OCs or good self-inserts. Because, as you said, a Sue is characterised by how the characters and world around her are bent out of shape to accomodate her. She's Miss The-Rules-Don't-Apply-To-Me.
Reply
But I still say that good OCs can still be Sues... Cliches can be done well, but that doesn't make them any less cliche, after all.
Reply
Anyway, as far I remember, they were born in Star Trek fandom. Aint' right?
As for your post, well... I'm quite agree with you. I don't like "Mary Sues", neither other "lame female characters", but I can see why people need self-insertions in any series.
The fact is I just don't like any made up character, I cannot see the point of making up characters as any series has tons of interesting characters.
Perhaps it's the main reason because mostly of fanfics are just too weak. People uses to write anything trying to fit the canon as they'd like it'd be.
But the use of "Mary Sue" term is being quite abussive. "Cliché" is the correct tern, "Mary Sue" is just a type of "Cliché"
---And I don't think "Da Vinci code" is just an enjoyable novel.
Reply
I guess it's part of that whole "writing what I'd like to read" thing as opposed to always writing what I think other people will want to read. I like to try to do a little bit of both, personally, but it never surprises me that the stories that focus on the canon characters get far more attention than any that focus on made-up characters. When all is said and done, in the Tranformers universe there are PLENTY of canon characters that need to be explored. There isn't much reason to go and create new ones.
Except, of course, that it's fun to do so. :) If nothing else, it's an easy way to insert oneself into the fictional universe that you love. That, of course, is the appeal for most people. But not, of course, for everyone. :)
Reply
Isn't that a tad bit hypocritical, though? ;) "I don't like OCs, but when I write OCs and self-inserts, it's different."
Not that we don't all have a bit of that kind of hypocrisy in us - it just is much more easy to find one's own OCs interesting (after all, we created them because we felt the desire to do so) than to find someone else's OCs interesting. Unless those "other people's OCs" push all one's right buttons, that is. ;) ($DEITY knows my headspace is Waywardchara Central...)
Reply
Hypocritical? No, I don't think so. I'm just acknowledging that I, like probably most people, prefer to read stories focusing on canon characters, not original characters. I like my OCs, sure, because they're mine and therefore inherently interesting to me. That doesn't mean that I think they're somehow "better" than someone else's OC/self-insert because, in general, they aren't. It just means that I like them; I don't really expect anyone else to do so.
Which, in the end, is why most of what I write isn't OC-focused. And when I do write an OC story, it's a case of me writing what I'd like to read, as opposed to writing something that I believe other people might enjoy just as much as I do. Like I said, I have done a bit of both, but I "publish" OC stories far less often that I will publish non-OC stories because I believe that other people won't enjoy them nearly so much as I do. So why bother sharing it, you ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Of course, it IS a good thing to be aware of cliches and to avoid them if you want to. Like I said, though, I've just realized that there are some people -- many people, even -- who enjoy the cliches. Who am I to deny them of that which they enjoy, eh? :)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment