Facebook and Twitter Connect, Pingbacks

Aug 31, 2010 18:16


We've got some exciting updates this week, so sit tight and we'll get started. Of course, news would not be complete without a special gift from Frank. It appears that he neglected to celebrate birthdays this month. So, in the spirit of better late than never, please rip a zippy yippee if you were born in August, and Frank'll send you a ginger ( Read more... )

frankandmeme, photophile, pingbacks, facebook and twitter connect, repost tags, webmoney

Leave a comment

blue_ant September 1 2010, 03:17:12 UTC
All right, LJ. I tried this out. I have a locked LJ, so does my sister. With her permission, I turned on the twitter connect and commented on one of her locked posts and reposted it to twitter. Not only does that work, but you include the text of the comment -- posted in a LOCKED post -- as well as a link to the post. Sure, it's locked, but why is this even possible? Why allow this feature since the people who're looking at the post potentially aren't on LJ and thus not friends with people with locked posts?

Please, please allow us to opt out: getting rid of the repost links, as well as the ability of others to repost comments on OUR posts (in personal LJs and communities). Also, fix the / tag thing while you're at it. And bring back the feature that allowed someone to turn off comment notifications -- but not when we reply to a comment within the post.

But mostly, please turn off (or allow ME to turn off) the ability of others to invade my privacy.

Reply

blue_ant September 1 2010, 14:10:30 UTC
Hopefully they'll (finally) listen to their users.

Reply

whatsername104 September 1 2010, 05:22:30 UTC
FIX THIS PLEASE

Reply

mimiheart September 1 2010, 05:44:22 UTC
This. x1000. What an idiotic thing. Grrr...

Reply

acroamatica September 1 2010, 07:04:40 UTC
That is SO NOT okay. LJ, please fix this; I do not ever want my LJ connected to anything else that I do not specifically choose to connect it to. Not EVER.

Reply

paxnirvana September 1 2010, 16:56:30 UTC
this this this x10,000

no one should be able to override my settings. NO ONE.

FIX IT!

Reply

xcarex September 1 2010, 21:20:24 UTC
AGREED.

Reply

dissociative September 2 2010, 04:32:00 UTC
I do not ever want my LJ connected to anything else that I do not specifically choose to connect it to.

EXACTLY! LJ this is the dumbest move yet!

It baffles me why sites think Id want all my content connected any way. I dont have my facebook connected to anything else I do and it will stay that way as long as I can help it. There are people who I definitely dont want to know anything about whats in my LJ.

I saw this quote the other day on someones FB:
"I was going to post a status but then I remembered I had family on facebook!"

I was going to post in my LJ but then I remembered its not safe anymore!

Reply

renne September 1 2010, 07:43:53 UTC
OH JESUS WHAT. DO NOT WANT. EVER.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Re: LJ, fix this please! skreidle September 1 2010, 14:49:29 UTC
The posts do--though a link to the locked post is created elsewhere, without the OP's control--but the content of the comments are controlled by the comment author, who could previously manually cross-post their comment content.

Reply

Re: LJ, fix this please! makhsihed September 1 2010, 15:55:20 UTC
Question - When a link to the locked post is created elsewhere, does it use the subject heading of the locked post as the link text?

Only rabbit girl can express my dismay!

Reply

Re: LJ, fix this please! skreidle September 1 2010, 16:12:00 UTC
Dangit.. I did see an answer to this somewhere, but now I can't find it. Boo!

Reply

Re: LJ, fix this please! emarkienna September 2 2010, 14:40:00 UTC
but the content of the comments are controlled by the comment author

Though this was never previously how things worked with FO posts - the security is controlled by the journal owner. Consider, imagine if LJ changed it so that although a FO post was secure, people replying could make their replies public on LJ? Even without introducing the idea of other social network accounts, this would still seem bizarre behaviour to me. And suddenly changing the behaviour would be a fundamental change to how LJ works. For starters, it wouldn't be possible to have filtered posts, without other people knowing that you'd filtered them off.

who could previously manually cross-post their comment contentSure, but I think people doing that would knowingly be malicious - the fear here is that if it's there as a feature, especially if no one had complained about it, then people are more likely to cross-post without thinking of the implications. There's also the way that it's linked to the original post, rather than simply being a genuine multipost (and ( ... )

Reply

Re: LJ, fix this please! iheartnickcath September 2 2010, 03:51:30 UTC
I agree, that stuff should STAY private and not have someone able to post it everywhere, thats invasion of privacy!

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


Leave a comment

Up