August News

Aug 02, 2007 16:18

We bid a very fond farewell to rahaeli last week, who started working for LiveJournal back in January 2003 when the LJ staff consisted of just a few people. We're sending out huge thanks for all of her work and contributions, and best of luck in her future as an author. You can keep track of her writing career at mccuneblog. We'll miss you, D!

Updates To Your ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

stormcloude August 3 2007, 21:14:26 UTC
I guess Six Apart has drawn a line in the sand:

Dear LiveJournal user stormcloude ( ... )

Reply

pariah164 August 3 2007, 21:17:41 UTC
That last line made me giggle. LOL Hitchhiker's Guide.

Reply

guardianmars August 3 2007, 21:19:15 UTC
Wait, but who decided that it had no artistic merit?

Reply

stormcloude August 3 2007, 21:21:49 UTC
A group consisting of members of LiveJournal's Abuse Prevention Team, LiveJournal employees, and Six Apart staff reviewed the content that was reported to us.

Reply

guardianmars August 3 2007, 21:29:17 UTC
Oh. And they are the be-all-end-all of artistic merit.

Very nice. :D

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

rejects August 4 2007, 02:04:27 UTC
I love you so much right now, reading all your other comments. ;_;

Reply

kat_chan August 4 2007, 03:26:23 UTC
Thank you for the voice of reason.

It's not like they didn't make the new policy clear when Barak posted it. I remember telling someone at the time that it meant that most of what people had been getting away with up to this point wasn't going to fly any longer. And it's not like there aren't other places where you can archive the art and then post a link to it on LJ.

A lot of wank that could have been avoided if people didn't feel the need to walk up to the line, stick a toe over it, and dare something to happen.

Reply

doro_chan August 3 2007, 21:21:56 UTC
I definitely did see artistic merit in ponderosa121's picture. What I did not see was a minor.

Reply

pheret1 August 3 2007, 21:29:27 UTC
I agree on both of those comments.

Reply

guardianmars August 3 2007, 21:29:47 UTC
Agreed.

Reply

ladypeyton August 3 2007, 22:03:53 UTC
I saw an obvious teenager.

Reply

doro_chan August 3 2007, 22:11:40 UTC
Well, a teenager's not necessarily a minor. And I'm used to manga. Which is why it's really hard to determine whether a drawn character is a minor or an adult. To me, he looked like 18-22.

Reply

ladypeyton August 3 2007, 22:13:00 UTC
Anyone under the age of 18 is considered a minor in the US.

Reply

doro_chan August 3 2007, 22:15:19 UTC
I know. But I did not see a minor.

Reply

bale_ikura August 3 2007, 22:25:04 UTC
Except the age of consent is 16 and no where did Ponderosa state that it was non-con so really, it's all legal.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up