That wasn't too exciting was itsara_at_guelphJanuary 18 2007, 21:05:36 UTC
:( shouldn't the second trailer give us more information than the first one? Oh well, they just really want us to have to go to the movie. And we probably will.
That seemed a little stilted, now, didn't it? The voiceover just made it worse. I'm still unsure how to feel about all the changes, and this just sort of adds right on.
Ones gotta wonder about that announcer dude... deep voice all dramatic and stuff... I recon its some short scrawny guy...
ANYWAY! Idk... Im still ticked they changed the movie from the book so much, but I guess the movie looks ok (If I pretend it has nothing to do with the book)
Yeah first trailer was definately much better done.
I think the second trailer was really only made to tease us into wanting to see it more...
I agree with firemantis that sure, it actualy looks like a decent movie... If they give it a different title, different character names, etc. Thats a bit rash but you get the point... They slaughtered the books plot, though I think that was the only way they could make any real money.... At least the set looks good.
Comments 6
Reply
Reply
Reply
ANYWAY! Idk... Im still ticked they changed the movie from the book so much, but I guess the movie looks ok (If I pretend it has nothing to do with the book)
Liked the first trailer more though.
Reply
I think the second trailer was really only made to tease us into wanting to see it more...
I agree with firemantis that sure, it actualy looks like a decent movie... If they give it a different title, different character names, etc. Thats a bit rash but you get the point... They slaughtered the books plot, though I think that was the only way they could make any real money.... At least the set looks good.
Reply
Leave a comment