I've put all the results into a spreadsheet (only for the poll open to all - I wasn't quite sad enough to analyse both polls). A total of 865 votes were cast for stories by 21 entrants, so that each entrant had on average about 40 votes spread over their stories. The number of votes is obviously likely to be heavily inflenced by the popularity of the fandoms in which people are writing. When I voted myself, I passed over about half a dozen writers because all their entries were for fandoms with which I am unfamiliar.
The object of the exercise was to see whether it was an advantage for a writer to have a name occurring early in the alphabet. The results suggest that it was. All of the first four writers in the list received more than 50 votes for their bunnies, while none of the last eight received more than 40. Maybe if the exercise is repeated next year the writers should be listed in reverse alphabetical order to even things out a bit?
If anyone would like a copy of the spreadsheet, then please let me know.
Or perhaps the polling could be broken up into no more than 5 authors per post? If you use the scroll down method one long post is a lot more time intimidating than several shorter posts.
Comments 13
Reply
Reply
Reply
The object of the exercise was to see whether it was an advantage for a writer to have a name occurring early in the alphabet. The results suggest that it was. All of the first four writers in the list received more than 50 votes for their bunnies, while none of the last eight received more than 40. Maybe if the exercise is repeated next year the writers should be listed in reverse alphabetical order to even things out a bit?
If anyone would like a copy of the spreadsheet, then please let me know.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(And look at all those Narnia stories. Interesting. I shall enjoy reading some of them very much, I think.)
Reply
Looks like there's still Megan/Larry love out there.
And look at all those Narnia stories. Interesting. I shall enjoy reading some of them very much, I think.
Me too.
Reply
Leave a comment