You Won't Believe What I'm Reading

Jul 13, 2012 17:01

I've been reading, but alas, it's non-fiction at the moment.

Still, the title ought to give a few people pause:  Everything I Know About Love I Learned from Romance Novels, by Sarah Wendell (aka Smart Bitch Sarah) from smartbitchestrashybooks.com.

Yes, you read that right.

No, I'm not planning on starting a romance novel habit.

I am enjoying the book a ( Read more... )

reading, ponderables

Leave a comment

Comments 5

amusingmuse July 14 2012, 03:32:49 UTC
I double dip. I prefer reading Regency romances. A good one has plenty of witty repartee or amusing antics to make me chuckle. My husband made some snide remarks about romance and I finally dug out one of my Barbara Metzger's. I heard chuckles and laughs out of him as he read the incredibly amusing "Miss Lockheart's Letters".

Some of the stereotypes make me roll my eyes. I mean the hero can no longer have congress with his 'bit o' muslin' after he meets our heroine...even when they are 'at daggers drawn' without a hint of even attraction yet. yeah. right.

Reply

mtlawson July 16 2012, 16:37:38 UTC
Yes, the stereotypes in both the books and the readers were amusing. One of them, that romances will give women an unrealistic expectation of men, made me laugh out loud. I think men IRL bust that bubble without any help from women at all.

I have this uncontrollable urge to grow a mullet now.

Reply


tracy_d74 July 15 2012, 19:39:57 UTC
I don't like traditional, heaving-bossom-throbbing-rod romances. I just can't stomach them. If there is a story with a romantic thread, I'll go for that. I just need for the characters to . . . you know . . . think. I like a little rational thought with my emotions. But that says something about me. I'm not an all emotions or all thought person.

Reply

mtlawson July 16 2012, 16:42:04 UTC
One thing that the book brought out was that Romances have changed quite a bit from the 70s/80s borderline rape stories. Behavior in those stories would (at the very least) end up with the hero getting a restraining order on him IRL.

What I also found interesting were the number of women that had info in the book who have a complete disconnect between what they like in their Romance hero and a guy IRL. One of them speculated that it was because they could see inside the hero's head, which made things more obvious, but still I found that very surprising.

Reply

tracy_d74 July 16 2012, 17:34:44 UTC
That is interesting about what you like IRL vs. book. But I think that is true. In Pride and Prejudice the movie, at the end, what Mr. Darcy says to Lizzy is ...amazing. But if a guy said that IRL I would totally think he was gay.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up