Last year, my aim was really to read more books - I had been disappointed by how relatively little I'd read in 2009, and wanted to get my book larnin' game back on.
Seriously, I'd emphasise the "relative" in "relatively little in 2009". I mean, 38 is nearly twice what I read this year, and I had a good year! And last year I read about nine books, though it felt like more, which made me very sad.
So, you know, don't beat yourself up about it (or rub it in, natch).
I think Infinite Jest is on the cards for next year. Although I'm pretty sure any time I've suggested I might read it, you were less than complementary about my ambitions versus ability.
Also: I think I'm buying a Kindle purely to read the big hardbacks I own - all the Baroque Cycle, 2666, etc - on the train, because I am really bored of all the books I like being heavy. The James Ellroys have been pushing it this year.
Yeah, it's very much relative. Also, and I did try to point this out in my entry, I read a reasonable number of books that fit anywhere on the bad to mediocre spectrum, so any count is going to be chock full o ballast.
I'm pretty sure any time I've suggested I might read it, you were less than complementary about my ambitions versus ability.
I had not read Infinite Jest when I cast those aspersions! Redacted, redacted. And I can see the benefits of a Kindle for that and other weighty books. If you're taking it on the train it's about as heavy as a toddler.
Ah, but what I like about the physicality MASSIVE books is also the pleasure of seeing how much you've read of it/how much of the MIGHTY MOUNTAIN OF WORDS you have scaled.
(Dude, would you ever be interested in reading my thesis?)
The mountain of words aspect was nice! The aaargh footnote arrgh footnote to footnote aaaargh train going round a corner LOST MY PLACE aspect, less so.
I'd definitely be interested in reading yr thesis. You have my email addresss...
Hahahahahha you didn't know about FUN until this year? :)
also co-sign on Focault's Pendulum! The first 50 pages are a bit of a slog but then it's awesome and fair cracks along. I, on the other hand, have never read in the name of the rose, although I've read the rest of Eco's big novelly things (but not theory etc)
No, and fun is totally amazing, I think you would like it! (The thesis was kind of about the limits of fun - i.e. what counts as such, i.e. the implications of the fact that having a not very good time in a club is still characterised as FUN whereas having a lovely time sitting on the sofa reading a book is not.)
This Eco news is good news. And I have The Name Of The Rose if you fancy a read of it, it is ace.
oh you definitely have to read Foucault's Pendulum, it is sheer delight and much more a silly airport historical thriller than anyone gives it credit for.
Dude, this kind of post makes me wish for more LJ. I wish that the smart people I know wrote more at length pieces rather than Facebook oneliners. I am particularly impressed by your use of graphs.
I sadly lost my diary in the middle of the year, so don't have a complete record of what I read. Not that much, this year, I fear. Also, walking in as opposed to commuting means I read less.
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it, I must remember that writing is not as hard as I think it is.
I suspect I'd miss commuting a bit if I could walk to work - it's nice to have time to read in when I'd otherwise be bored rather than time when I'd otherwise be asleep...
Comments 15
So, you know, don't beat yourself up about it (or rub it in, natch).
I think Infinite Jest is on the cards for next year. Although I'm pretty sure any time I've suggested I might read it, you were less than complementary about my ambitions versus ability.
Also: I think I'm buying a Kindle purely to read the big hardbacks I own - all the Baroque Cycle, 2666, etc - on the train, because I am really bored of all the books I like being heavy. The James Ellroys have been pushing it this year.
Reply
I'm pretty sure any time I've suggested I might read it, you were less than complementary about my ambitions versus ability.
I had not read Infinite Jest when I cast those aspersions! Redacted, redacted. And I can see the benefits of a Kindle for that and other weighty books. If you're taking it on the train it's about as heavy as a toddler.
Reply
(Dude, would you ever be interested in reading my thesis?)
Reply
I'd definitely be interested in reading yr thesis. You have my email addresss...
Reply
also co-sign on Focault's Pendulum! The first 50 pages are a bit of a slog but then it's awesome and fair cracks along. I, on the other hand, have never read in the name of the rose, although I've read the rest of Eco's big novelly things (but not theory etc)
Reply
This Eco news is good news. And I have The Name Of The Rose if you fancy a read of it, it is ace.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
**I have never read THB&THG
Reply
I sadly lost my diary in the middle of the year, so don't have a complete record of what I read. Not that much, this year, I fear. Also, walking in as opposed to commuting means I read less.
Reply
I suspect I'd miss commuting a bit if I could walk to work - it's nice to have time to read in when I'd otherwise be bored rather than time when I'd otherwise be asleep...
Reply
Leave a comment