oh em gee.

Mar 20, 2005 21:38

Am in the middle of watching Tipping the Velvet, and though they've gotten a few things dead wrong (like the casting of Rachael Stirling as Nan, which earns a big whaaa? for dark-haired girliness where there ought to be fair androgyny), I have to take a moment here to say that

KEELEY HAWES IS TEH SEX.

That is all.

Leave a comment

Comments 6

poisoninjest March 21 2005, 11:25:05 UTC
Hee... I love that movie! :o) I'm actually glad I saw the movie before I read the book; the differences didn't bother me as much that way.

Reply

moonwhip March 22 2005, 04:55:50 UTC
Have you watched the uncut version on dvd? I heard the BBCA version was conspicuously dildo-free, but the one I watched had many a lingering shot of it, so I assume all the cut material is back in for the dvd version.

Reply


pandarus March 21 2005, 16:44:54 UTC
Oh, HELL yeah.

Rachael Stirling was *such* a disappointment though - I mean, she's quite lickable and all, but - wtf? Very much not a convincing boy. I was quite excited anyway, because my Diana Rigg love is considerable, but - yeah. Disappointing casting choice.

Still, Keeley Hawes. Gah.

Reply

moonwhip March 22 2005, 05:02:21 UTC
Exactly -- she's lovely but wrong. But Keeley, indeed. I rather wish she'd had some of the less timid sex scenes.

Reply


remainthesame March 22 2005, 11:50:02 UTC
I have the dvd, though I haven't watched it yet, but when I saw the cover? I thought the EXACT same thing.

Reply

moonwhip March 22 2005, 16:41:44 UTC
Couldn't she have had some reason to dress in boy clothes on MI-5? Or corsets? I like corsets.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up