Comments | moogle1: I object

moogle1

I object

Aug 08, 2005 12:55

http://www.castleparadox.com/ohr/review-display.php?review=441

SpyJim gets a 6 on graphics? A 6?!

The graphics are positively banal! They're the worst I've produced! Only the maptiles are even half-decent and there can't be more than six in the entire ( Read more... )

castle paradox, spyjim

Comments 9

aethereall August 8 2005, 21:22:56 UTC

You forget that I'm not around anymore to moderate the reviews.

aliasjack August 9 2005, 03:40:20 UTC

Nor I.

anonymous August 8 2005, 22:48:35 UTC

The graphics on SpyJim were a joke. And that score is an even bigger joke. But if you ever need someone to draw up the graphics for SpyJim2, hit me up and I'll help ya out. I can show you some of my more recent graphics if you'd like examples.

majinchu August 8 2005, 23:34:00 UTC

HEY ANONYMOUS, WHY DON'T YOU WRITE A POEM AND NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO YOURSELF?!

(The comment has been removed)

moogle1 August 9 2005, 02:53:16 UTC

The graphics on SpyJim were intentionally a joke, which is why the score is so puzzling.

I'll let you know if I want your help for a later episode.

rubberbandiv August 9 2005, 00:55:10 UTC

A 6 is a D according to the American school system.

jsh357 August 9 2005, 02:41:56 UTC

I like how he started up a review request thread and his reviews aren't even very special.
(Plus he refuses to review demos, which is the most retarded thing I've ever seen)
((Plus, he's the most obvious altnick I've seen in months))

moogle1 August 9 2005, 02:52:17 UTC

You think? For whom?

I might've noticed if I were paying attention. I thought vandam was the most obvious one I've seen in months, but maybe it's been more than months for him.

jsh357 August 9 2005, 02:56:21 UTC

Well, the only hint I can give you of my suspicions without potentially igniting the fury of the unnamed is that he only wanted to review completed games, and just recently made the offer. I couldn't even guess who it ACTUALLY is, but I have some reasonable theories.