Earlier today I mentioned that the Case of the Week format on Undercovers was wearing on me...shortly after praising Hawaii Five-O, and I realized that sounds horribly hypocritical.
I think the narrative voice on H5O appeals to me more, so I'm willing to give it more leeway. Something about Undercovers is very slow and bland despite all the
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
Reply
Hawaii 5-0 on the other hand, what problems it's got, does have charm to it, mainly because of the emsemble and how well they're gelling, and there are actual distinct characterizations. Undercovers, if I'm being honest, is just too bland for charm. Which is a shame, because I really wanted to like this show.
Reply
You're right, it's lacking in "oomph." For all the exotic locales and "exciting" cases, there's nothing else there.
If Steven and Samantha are going to be your established, married couple who ground the show, then I think everybody else *around* them needs to be a lot more dynamic. Since we already know "who's going to hook up" (which is, let's face it, the question MOST of the TV audience asks themselves), you have to compensate with the rest of the cast. It's like HIMYM...we all know Ted has to Meet The Mother. So his *friends* all have to be the ones doing things we can't predict! But Hoyt, Cranky Ol' Boss, and that guy Sam hooked up with...well, they're just not that interesting.
Reply
Leave a comment