None really. I needed rant space.

[mmmmurgle]

Descartes still annoys me, but less so than when I was reading only snippet extracts of his words. Also at that point in time, the chip on my shoulder was much more arrogant. You arrogant chip you

Comments

[electricsweater]

I tend to agree with you. Philosophy is bad science...it always seems like logical jumps that are (ussually) logical, but still backwards and not entirely convincing unless you were already predisposed to be convinced. It also seems very self serving, but thats just my take. Still, intellectual psuedo-science is what separates us from the animals.

[profmadhatter]

The Ontological argument of the existence of God is one of the most elegant and beautiful things I've ever seen. Unfortunately it is easy as fuck to tear apart, but that's not the point. You don't read philosophy as science. Descartes is a cone. Hume on miracles is good times though. I am talking about philosophy. This is a comment. I am a user.

[yelac]

i have a argument for the outside world existence that can't be beat. except by happy people. this theoretical race of man destorys my argument.

of philsophy i say this; full fathoms five thy father lies.
that was about the time Descartes teamed up with Sinbad.

the important thing to remember is history is impossible and everything you ain't be perfect