Tony Blair has put British security at risk by his uncritical support for US foreign policy of warmongering and aggression in the Middle East, thereby provoking anger among British Muslims
( Read more... )
Pre-emptive strikesmethodiusAugust 30 2006, 11:14:55 UTC
Only when they've finished with Iran, by which time Bush will probably be long gone.
But I wouldn't put it past Hillary Clinton. George Bush had to bomb Baghdad because his daddy had a war and he wanted one too. So Hillary Clinton will probably bomb Bradford because her hubby bombed Belgrade.
Re: Pre-emptive strikesmethodiusAugust 30 2006, 16:50:23 UTC
There's that Barak fellow, he seems to talk a lot of sense.
But he's probably unelectable -- doesn't seem to know how to lose friends and antagonise people, which seems to be the main qualifiaction for US presidential candidates these days.
Don't worry about it. Soon America will find a new best friend to blame. Just look at the way many American politicians blamed Canada after 9/11. Never mind the fact that none of the hijackers had ever been in Canada -- somebody was responsible, and of course it couldn't have been an American intelligence failure.
Comments 5
Reply
But I wouldn't put it past Hillary Clinton. George Bush had to bomb Baghdad because his daddy had a war and he wanted one too. So Hillary Clinton will probably bomb Bradford because her hubby bombed Belgrade.
Reply
Now it seems she's just another politician who'll do whatever it takes to rake in the votes.
Reply
But he's probably unelectable -- doesn't seem to know how to lose friends and antagonise people, which seems to be the main qualifiaction for US presidential candidates these days.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment