Comments | melvin_udall: China, media, iraq, illegals, liberal ethics, lawyers, fred thompson, libby, coulter, war on terror

melvin_udall

China, media, iraq, illegals, liberal ethics, lawyers, fred thompson, libby, coulter, war on terror

Jul 09, 2007 09:29

China is still trying to kill us. This time with tainted fish. Yay for free trade.

China is also moving into Iraq I'm sure that bodes well for stability once we leave ( Read more... )

liberal media, iraq war, lawyers, terrorism, illegal immigrants, china, libby, fred thompson, war on terror, ann coulter, liberal ethics

Comments 6

wellarmedsmurf July 9 2007, 15:22:53 UTC

Your comment on a VA drivers license reminded me...
PA and VA now have full reciprocity for CHPs, so if you still have a valid PA permit, you should be good.

just a thought.

melvin_udall July 9 2007, 18:35:23 UTC

I'd forgotten. I may eventually head back up and renew then. Thanks!

(The comment has been removed)

melvin_udall July 9 2007, 18:39:12 UTC

She was never a field reporter... She got the job because she's a woman and a liberal, and now she's going to blame sexism?

Yep. Victimhood, my friend. You must put them there to fulfill a quota for "fairness" to < insert victim group > and if they can't make it you're anti-< insert victim group >

I'm surprised they aren't seriously pushing to have the Nielsens readjust their stats (lower standards) due to gender bias.

Not the first, and certainly not the last, time.

(The comment has been removed)

melvin_udall July 9 2007, 18:40:47 UTC

HOLY SHIT that's funny and a good idea. Let's make it everyone with an STD.

(The comment has been removed)

melvin_udall July 9 2007, 19:17:14 UTC

Actually Bush did way less to prevent terrorism than Clinton did

8 months, and after a heavily contested election.

8 years.

Yes, that's the same.

This is evidenced by Richard Clarke in his congressional testimony

Richard Clarke? Seriously?

This article is shit if you ask me.

I respect your differing opinion.

Diss Gore all you want but he was right about Iraq, and Bush was wrong.

What exactly was he right about?
That there were no WMDs? That's a 50-50 shot if you take out of the equation that world intelligence services and Saddam both said he had them.
That the war would be a quagmire? We won the war. The occupation was handled shittily. And any asshole can constantly scream doom and gloom and occasionally be right. The liberals are experts at it. WHat were his suggestions that were right if that's the case?

More important, did you read the article, or determine it didn't blame Bush and jerk your knee at the keyboard?

If the article is "shit" please tell me what is factually inaccurate in the article if and when ( ... )

radagast14 July 9 2007, 17:10:05 UTC

Ann Coulter's a genius. Liberals can stage a trap for her and she still runs circles around them.