(Untitled)

Jun 09, 2013 21:56

This story would destroy an administration were it Republican. Sen. Mark Kirk to Eric Holder: Is DOJ spying on Congress? "Holder assured Kirk that “there is no intention to do anything of that nature - that is, to spy on members of Congress or to spy on the Supreme Court ( Read more... )

homosexuality, gays, single parent

Leave a comment

Comments 3

ford_prefect42 June 10 2013, 03:14:48 UTC
On watergate. Yes, when this argument was made, only the IRS scandal was out. Frankly, Watergate WAS worse than the IRS scandal. BUT, that was *before* the AP scandal, the Verizon scandal, the magnitude and breadth of the persecution of "true the vote", prism, Benghazi, and the fact that ALL of those have been admitted to by the administration.... And of course, the fact that Nixon was *resigned* for something as *insignificant* by comparison as watergate!

Said it before, and I will say it again, Obama is a flat out, no holds barred MONSTER.

Reply


justgoto June 10 2013, 03:27:43 UTC
This story would destroy an administration were it Republican.
But Obama doesn't care what it will do to the country... on second thought, it is exactly what he intends to happen to this country.

Obamacare is a form of data mining.
The abortion activists should be against Obamacare; Roe vs Wade was about privacy, the government had no place in the operating room. How times have changed... actually, nothing has changed, democrats still are hypocrites.

Reply


mosinging1986 June 10 2013, 17:02:05 UTC
At a minimum, the evidence of a connection between being sexually abused as a child and homosexual or bisexual orientation as an adult is so widespread that the refusal of the scientific community to seriously consider a causal connection suggests a willful blindness.

Wow! Someone's finally saying this!

I haven't seen a homosexual yet who didn't have some issue of abuse, neglect or other serious family dysfunctions.

I know people who have successfully walked away from homosexuality, and are perfectly happy, decades later, as straight people.

So do I. But every time I bring up this point in a discussion it's either completely ignored as though I never said it, or I'm told that such people were never "real" homosexuals to begin with. I have never, ever seen any other response.

The fact that there's even one such person - even one! - demolishes the claim that homosexuality is inborn and therefore cannot ever be changed.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up