Do I really HAVE to explain to some yutz the many, many reasons why Simoun is a better representation of queer people (even in a fantasy context) and theories and experiences of queerness than Queer as Folk is? Really? REALLY?
One is a Nishimura Junji series with input from Mashimo Kouichi (he of the Girls-with-Guns Trilogy) and major Japanese
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
Reply
But there's really no comparison in my opinion. Simoun is somebody's magnum opus and got screened at the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art and the Milan Screen Society. Queer as Folk reached a broader audience with its points and many of them were good points but that wasn't what this person was saying. They were GENUINELY SAYING THAT QAF IS A BETTER PIECE OF ART.
Reply
[/personal issues]
Just from what I know of QAF and of Simoun, I think you're probably right in any case. It's just...yeah. Issues.
Reply
Simoun consciously set out to be something extraordinary. RTD actually has an explicit and admitted distaste for the extraordinary, or at least, for characters who are extraordinary (read: not selfish, venal, myopic, unpleasant, &c. No room for the powerful and passionate girls of Simoun.)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment