Today in my Individual Rights class in the midst of discussion on Bowers v. Hardwick, our professor queried the big question(s): What fundamental rights are conveyed by the Constitution? What rights are inferred? What rights are protected even if they aren't explicitly stated in the Constitution
(
Read more... )
Comments 35
But lol-ing at the discussion of rimming. LOL
/would die laughing
XD
Reply
LET'S FOCUS ON THE RIMMING. My prof makes the best random references haha.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
But let's focus on the lulz! RIMMING SHOULD BE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, Y/N.
Reply
I hate to generalize, but it's almost always the guys who say dumbass shit because they never have to be in the situation.
Reply
Reply
ahaha, I think I would have a jolt of surprise too if the majority of my class knew what rimming was. I mean, on one hand we're supposed to be librarians in training so combine us together and we should know everything under the sun, or be able to find out about it in ten seconds. But on the other hand, classmates, what the hell.
Reply
Reply
But I once had one brilliant class (out of thousand of dull ones, of course). It's about law of sexuality so we discussed a lot about homosexual, abortion, homo-parenting, etc. At some point, we reached to the moment that my professor claimed that a male transsexual prostitute with penis is the most expensive in market; or; another time, whether a man who loves being penetrated at his rear but only by a woman, will be considered as gay.
I don't even recall which court decision/law article led us to that extremely unnecessary,yet juicy,info..
ah..one precious moment in my law school life (lol)
Reply
Definitely a more fun/interesting class than most, for sure.
Reply
also, omg, inorite! I read an article on New Who the other day and it talked about how slash goggles are trained into one, which is so true!
technically everything except the missionary position is still outlawed in Singapore, I think. oh, colonial leftovers.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment