Leave a comment

Comments 16

anime_babble March 12 2013, 00:48:02 UTC
Yeah, pretty much the reason I have no desire to see this.

Reply


rose_griffes March 12 2013, 00:54:48 UTC
Ditto what the above commenter said, although I hadn't heard that particular quote before. I am way more interested in reading the books now than I was before--I never read them when I was young.

Reply

nekobot01 March 12 2013, 01:06:24 UTC
The books are really wonderful - but written for a child audience. :)

I find them much more satisfying than any of the film adaptations. The annotated Wizard of Oz is a fun read, too, if you can find it at the library.

Reply

meganbmoore March 12 2013, 01:43:47 UTC
I read a large chunk of them when young and reread a couple a few years ago, and thought they held up well. I mean, definitely for 10 year olds, but still enjoyable as an adult.

Reply


nekobot01 March 12 2013, 01:05:15 UTC
As a massive Baum-nerd, I've been really disappointed by the tone of the Oz coverage... and I'm assuming I would be infuriated by the film, too. It's just really frustrating to see a work that I love mangled like this by people whose understanding of the story goes as far as: Cinderella and Alice in Wonderland are the same thing.

I'm still waiting for somebody to make a film out of Ozma's origin story... there's a male protagonist for you. XD

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Marvelous_Land_of_Oz

Reply

meganbmoore March 12 2013, 01:44:55 UTC
If you read the whole article, the dude didn't even know there was a whole series of books, and pretty obviously didn't bother reading any of them.

Reply


the_jackalope March 12 2013, 01:50:18 UTC
Oh UGH. I mean, I mostly enjoyed the movie and I'm not SUPER annoyed that they chose to tell the Wizard's story as opposed to any of the MANY female stories in OZ (OK, I am a little, but I'll take an OZ story I can get), but there are TONS of male stories out there. SO MANY. And so many male centric fairy stories, there's one that just came out (Jack and the Beanstalk) but there's SO MANY OTHERS. Screw this idea that fairy tales are all about princesses. Clearly, not only has this man never read an OZ book beyond The Wizard of OZ, he's never read a fairy tale book either.

Reply

meganbmoore March 12 2013, 04:45:25 UTC
Apparently, he didn't even bother reading the first before deciding to make the movie.

I feel everyone would just be better off (re)watching Tin Man.

Reply

the_jackalope March 12 2013, 15:16:37 UTC
Wait. HE DIDN'T EVEN READ THE NOVEL? Well I guess that explains why Oscar is from Kansas. I sat there muttering in the theater, quite annoyed, that The Wizard was from Nebraska for the first 20 min or so.

Reply

meganbmoore March 12 2013, 22:22:58 UTC
If you read the whole article, it becomes obvious that while they may have skimmed a few books while making the movie, the MGM movie was almost exclusively their reference.

Reply


fivil March 12 2013, 07:47:24 UTC
This is pretty much what I thought when I saw the trailer to this Oz. Like ..fucking really now? We need to shove a male protagonist in there? And it's got to be James Franco? Dull! I doubt I'll ever see it.

Also annoyed me about the trailer - everybody was like "Only YOU can save us!", which is pretty all par for the course in a typical hero-centric Hollywood movie, which is precisely why it's so boring and been-there-done-that.

Reply

meganbmoore March 12 2013, 22:27:37 UTC
I don't have the hate everyone else seems to have for Franco (I...have no opinion of him, really) but my initial "Pretty, but WTF?" to the trailer seems to have been the best response.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up