Another kind election-results map

Nov 13, 2008 08:20

The problem with maps coloring the US red or blue is they don't show how many people live in the different areas.  You've seen cartograms:

Read more... )

election, data geeking

Leave a comment

Comments 4

ffoeg November 13 2008, 15:41:10 UTC
Does the brightness indicate the absolute total population of the county, or is it population density? That blue big county in So Cal (San Bernardino?) is pretty bright, but I wonder if the intensity is controlled for size. I think density would be better, but my guess is that they just used the absolute population.

Reply

grr_plus1 November 15 2008, 14:26:11 UTC
I immediately noticed San Berdoo as well (confusing it at first with San Diego, which is also huge and oddly shaped).

It's also striking how Orange County is a shining beacon of GOP floating in a sea of Blue.

Reply


mayica November 13 2008, 15:46:18 UTC
You're right, it is total population. I posted pretty quickly this morning, and hadn't thought about it. In the comment thread, they've got a density based map as well:

... )

Reply

ffoeg November 13 2008, 16:15:41 UTC
That's *much* better, imo.

I've been mulling a kind of map like this, but would show the total of all federal votes (i.e., president+senator+house). So Middlesex County, MA would max out on blue, because it voted for Obama, Frank (or whoever), Kerry, but Montana split its votes for the Republican House member and Baucus.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up