I would have liked to goto this meeting, but the first that I have seen of this item was *this* morning, despite the fact that I distinctly remember checking this blog a few times between then and its datestamp, including last night at the Panera just as they were closing; at all times I only saw the posts up to your ceiling damage item.
Most likely it's a glitch with Livejournal. Still, in the future, it might be a better idea to post notices like this in the Penguicon blog - as well as in this one, in the hope of increasing the chance that it will show up *somewhere*. And a bit more than 14 hours notice might also help.
Accepted. But I'm still wondering how this managed to appear with a datestamp of late Friday night, while being missed when I checked it several times on Saturday. It could be my browser - just now the responses were still absent until I hit refresh. But the browser on my handheld also missed this item.
Livejournal datestamps
anonymous
March 23 2008, 23:17:10 UTC
On further examination I notice that the datestamps of all the responses to this item have a (UTC) tag, but the datestamp of the original entry has no such tag. What time *did* you post it?
Comments 6
the fact that I distinctly remember checking this blog a few times between then and its datestamp, including last
night at the Panera just as they were closing; at all times I only saw the posts up to your ceiling damage item.
Most likely it's a glitch with Livejournal. Still, in the future, it might be a better idea to post notices
like this in the Penguicon blog - as well as in this one, in the hope of increasing the chance that it will show
up *somewhere*. And a bit more than 14 hours notice might also help.
Reply
Reply
while being missed when I checked it several times on Saturday. It could be my browser - just now
the responses were still absent until I hit refresh. But the browser on my handheld also missed
this item.
Reply
have a (UTC) tag, but the datestamp of the original entry has no such tag. What time *did*
you post it?
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment