Dissident

Feb 22, 2015 18:12

I sit
and I will be rewarded.

I shut up
and I will be praised.

I write,
but I stop.

Is this
going to drive them away?

Will they
even listen to what I say?

I am
afraid.

I ain't
no fighter on the ground.

Shamefully reminded
that a pencil is not a gun.

What is it
that I can do?

menschen, story writing, self development, violence, psychology, krieg, politik, journalism

Leave a comment

Comments 6

mandarinsun February 22 2015, 18:43:30 UTC
Maybe you should combat what you hate through Buddhism or studying Eastern thought. Gandhi took down the British Imperialist and Martin Luther King Jr took down the White Southern Racists that way.

The benefit is that you never have to openly engage violently against your enemies, you are always flanking them and trying to get better and better ground. Or just better ground that the bad ground you have. In the short term, it always works and has the benefit of its practitioner having to become violent and deal with legal authorities.

In the long term, maybe it is too passive to actually cause change, however it passes it off by saying people go through reincarnations towards becoming more and more Buddha like. So, it implies that maybe thousands of years from now everyone, or most people, will be enlightened but now nearly no one is ready for that.

Reply

matrixmann February 22 2015, 19:25:30 UTC
Without stating my position on this, I already have one. But some things you don't say on the internet.

Reply


nyxalinth February 22 2015, 19:07:02 UTC
I feel like this much of the time.

Reply


mandarinsun February 22 2015, 19:15:15 UTC
Writing is very Eastern in that it keeps the hope of a future revolution valid, but never really demands that it happens immediately. I bet the French, American, and Russian revolutions would have have happened without writing- though that sounds dumb to say, like of course they wouldn't have. But still, there are probably psychoanalytic books or essays about what writing is and how it both instills and defers action- or there could be. It reminds me of something concerning Derrida or Lacan. The problem with things that go with them though is that it gets lost in how intellectual and academic those guys were. It reeks of being too intellectual or something. I can picture how stuff like that makes people feel- overwhelmed and like it is reading nonsense- which to a large degree it is. However, it is difficult to talk about how writing is revolutionary without pointing back to something like psychoanalysis which Lacan and Derrida were also about ( ... )

Reply

matrixmann February 22 2015, 19:47:17 UTC
I don't know if that is originally Eastern ( ... )

Reply


blood type mandarinsun February 22 2015, 19:16:19 UTC
Oh, I meant that the French, American, and Russian revolutions would NEVER have happened without writing.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up