So, having been regularly getting books out from the local library[1], I was tempted to try the "classic" Heinlein that I'd never read. It's recommended in
the Guardian's 1000 books list, the only one of his works, and as I've enjoyed[2] many of his other books, even those dated, I finally got around to taking it out and trying to read it
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
That said, I've certainly not read his whole back catalogue and his article on wikipedia is keen to point out that he offers widely different ideas in different works. So maybe other people's experience is different.
I'm currently up to date with Charlie apart from the Laundry books, which for some strange reason I couldn't stomach. I think Cthulhu, MI5 and the approaching Singularity just came out all a bit twee when you mix it together. That said, most everything Mythos related not actually written by Lovecraft missed the mark by a fair margin - guess I'm just a purist :-P
Reply
Compare "Beyond This Horizon", which posits a happy world where everyone gets food for free, and the world is run by a genetic board, and his later novels.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_This_Horizon#Literary_significance_.26_criticism
is worth taking a quick look at.
The only constant thread is believing that personal liberty is important - it seems that he gave up on the idea of government being able to help with that over time.
Reply
Reply
The sexism in it drives me crazy now, too.
Reply
In fact it isn't just the politics - Heinlein is "old school SF" in the sense that he really doesn't seem to understand people (particularly women) very well at all, yet insists on writing about them. Worse than Niven. This is I think what informs his politics; it's student stuff, naive libertarian and then naive hippy.
Reply
Leave a comment