Re: Clicked post accidentally... continuesmatgbMay 21 2008, 17:40:15 UTC
more MPs=the possibility of greater representation.
Longstanding party policy-linked to proper devolution so that you've got councillors and AMs as well, and also linked to introducing STV for elections, so we all get more MPs anyway, they're more representative of the nation, but there are less of them in totality.
Less white-men-in-suits, but more representative. But you'd transplant some of the displced MPs to whatever replaces the existing Regional Assemblies.
there is a right-wing consensus in mainstream politics
Disagree that it's "right wing". It's further to the right of either of us, but it's centrist rather than right-the current consensus is centrist, corporatist and vaguely authoritarian.
wouldn't fit with the positioning as a 'centrist' party
I don't see the positioning as 'centrist'-the positioning is Liberal, which is neither left nor right on the 20C scale but opposed to the current corporatist consensus (which is why Cameron's posturing works as all he has to be is more liberal than the Govt, he doesn't have to be a liberal as us).
What would be the point of this? Individual voters can already give £3
It's a direct lift from the Power Commission report-I've got the full report in a book, they were giving htem away free, but it's on site, the Exec Summary is worth a read, from which:20. State funding to support local activity by political parties to be introduced based on the
( ... )
Comments 3
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
Longstanding party policy-linked to proper devolution so that you've got councillors and AMs as well, and also linked to introducing STV for elections, so we all get more MPs anyway, they're more representative of the nation, but there are less of them in totality.
Less white-men-in-suits, but more representative. But you'd transplant some of the displced MPs to whatever replaces the existing Regional Assemblies.
Reply
Disagree that it's "right wing". It's further to the right of either of us, but it's centrist rather than right-the current consensus is centrist, corporatist and vaguely authoritarian.
wouldn't fit with the positioning as a 'centrist' party
I don't see the positioning as 'centrist'-the positioning is Liberal, which is neither left nor right on the 20C scale but opposed to the current corporatist consensus (which is why Cameron's posturing works as all he has to be is more liberal than the Govt, he doesn't have to be a liberal as us).
What would be the point of this? Individual voters can already give £3
It's a direct lift from the Power Commission report-I've got the full report in a book, they were giving htem away free, but it's on site, the Exec Summary is worth a read, from which:20. State funding to support local activity by political parties to be introduced based on the ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment