So one of the things I keep tripping on, in the world of job discussion and resumes and networking sites and the like, is the definition of what I do. The word "analyst" is used far too loosely to cover far too many types of work.
Y'see, I don't program. I'm pretty good at using software and systems, but building them isn't in my wheelhouse. What I
(
Read more... )
Comments 2
I know people at work that would want to interview you solely based on what you're describing here alone. Of course, in our case it would mean moving.
You have a HIGHLY marketable skill that, honestly, these "certificates" are just universities trying to cash in on a phenomenon that's happening mostly outside of acedemia.
Also, look into quality control. American Society of Quality Engineers runs certification tests and ASQ certification is worthwhile because it is a "company agnostic" certification of your ability to monitor production "stuff" at whatever company. One heavy user down the road from you: Chrysler's Belvedere assembly plant.
I think this one is as much in how you pitch yourself as in who's piece of paper you've got.
Reply
I get what you're saying about the certificates. Nonetheless, I'm aware of useful tools and techniques in analysis that I don't yet understand and can't yet apply. Even if I never go for a full certification, some of the classes could wind up being very useful. And interesting!
Thanks for the input - once again you've given me useful tasty food for thought. *munch crunch munch...*
Reply
Leave a comment