(Untitled)

Jun 14, 2016 14:03

Сцуко, за что люблю людей учОных - так это за восхитительную смесь невежества и самоуверенности ( Read more... )

Ши Хуан Ди был прав, америжизненное, politics

Leave a comment

Comments 21

67red June 15 2016, 06:52:06 UTC
man_of_motley June 15 2016, 10:38:20 UTC
Меня потому и поражает что ж они за ученые такие. Где научный подход, где торжество логики, повторямость и объективная проверямость результатов? Впрочем, последнее время наука даже относительно «естесвенная» чем дальше, тем больше приобретает черты религии...

Reply


seadevil001 June 16 2016, 21:31:51 UTC
He is bad scientist, looks like. Good scientist should evaluate all available (easily available at least)facts and study subject before making any statements. He thinks that bazookas and tanks are outlawed - so he did not studied subject. And because he made statement on subject he did not studied - he is a bad scientist.

Reply

seadevil001 June 17 2016, 15:38:35 UTC
May be he is actually not that bad, he changed his position after people showed him facts.

Reply

man_of_motley June 17 2016, 15:57:18 UTC
Neither he is good, as the ability to understand own lack of knowledge is crucial for a scientist.

Reply

seadevil001 June 17 2016, 17:48:54 UTC
In the ideal world, yes...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up