Things that crack me up

Jun 21, 2005 03:13

If you saw much of me, which, most of you did during the school year, you may remember a few words/phrases I would say all the time. One of these is: "that cracks me up!" or some variation on said phrase. This is one time in which I stoop so low as to use a preposition at the end of a sentence without excusing myself. Anyway, here are a couple ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 7

kari_ann_mbc06 June 21 2005, 13:05:28 UTC
That sounds like something my mom would say... Think they're talking to eachother? lol
I hear you on the math thing. I'd forgotten that there really is non-college level math out there. It sure it a lot easier to explain.

Reply


groupieguppie June 21 2005, 20:35:45 UTC
All thanks to Perozzo, of course. I've forgotten Faraday's law of induction. Panic.

Reply

magnesiuladybug June 21 2005, 23:02:53 UTC
Panic? Pourquoi?

What did Faraday ever do to you!?

(it's Maxwell we SHOULD be after...)

Reply


kaial June 22 2005, 03:59:38 UTC
Derivitate is now my favorite verb. (that only took three tries :P) And who are these Maxwell and Faraday people you speak of? ;-)

Reply

magnesiuladybug June 22 2005, 20:42:28 UTC
I was wondering if you were going to fix that... ;)

Faraday: law of induction (induction, think coils w/ current running through... like resistance only not... oh yeah, you skipped everything remotely electrical... ha ha have fun.) I have forgtten it also...

Maxwell... heh... man w/ 4 enclosed-integral equation-laws, also known as: Biot-savart law, Ampere's law, no-name law, and... [thinks] RANDI, HELP!!! (was Gauss part of that conglomerate mix? To where has my brain disappeared?)

Reply

rosesandrue June 22 2005, 23:16:56 UTC
Maxwell is the man because he looked at everyone else's work, said 'ooh, cool!' and put it all into a paper and got his name on all of it.

Reply

magnesiuladybug June 22 2005, 23:55:42 UTC
Indeed he did.

He did put them together in an organized manner though, and realize that moving charge=current, moving current=field; and then he tried to do the same thing w/ magnets until he realized that you can't have isolated poles... and then he made it work anyway! And wow, now I'll stop.

What was the fourth law, though? (The no-name law and Gauss's law were similar, right?) Was there something along the lines of change in magnetic field and change in flux...isn't that Biot-Savart... and I'm confusing myself.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up