Something rotten in Hollande...

[madman101]

OK. It's starting to get too easy to see through this crap. At the very same time that France is fast intensifying it's war on MANUFACTURED terriblism in MALI - behind which is the NATO/USA ALLIE, Al QQeaedda*, (a USA/NATO, i.e., Central Banks, manufactured enemy) - there is suddenly this crazy protest of French right-wingers, (a la Koch-paid

Comments

[bobby1933]

My only problem with your interpretation of political economic matters is: How do you get one of the wealthy to be willing to be the sacrificial lamb for this right-wing conspiracy? How do you get somebody like bin Laden to take on the role of TERRORIST MENACE, and to use his religion as an excuse (which means that he risks hell in the afterlife as well as murder in this one). With the exception of Little Buffet (sorry i can't remember Warren's son's name) and a few Hollywood types and Left=Wing intellectuals whose true intentions can never be determined, i can't believe that any of the wealthy would be able to control their personal greed long enough to make a sacrifice for the cause of GROSS GLUT, MISERY FOR THE POOR, AND GLOBAL ROASTING.

[madman101]

It isn't a right-wing conspiracy. It is a collusion of vested interests serving the wealthy, where key members or groups on the right as well as on the left partake in corporate or covert/government strategies to fulfill the interests. Many one the right and on the left also serve this natural collusion through direct responsibility to their authorities, campaign donors or fancied constituents. And many, many more serve their interests simply by fighting amongst themselves, right versus left, which is very easilly manipulated, with money, via corporate media channels, habit, political structures, etc. We serve these interests simply by buying products and reinforcing the corporate status quo, or ignorantly accepting the, "lesser of two evils" logic, every time we consider voting

[bobby1933]

Either way bin Laden was a curiousity. A multi-millionaire who showed bravery in the defense of Afghanistan and became the leader of a terrorist organization. Perhaps that is not surprising since some people seem to rise to the top of whatever they are involved in. But there are not that many very wealthy people. They are not called the one-percent for nothing. And they do not have many friends and acquaintances who are not themselves very wealthy. The idea that bin Laden and (say) Cheney did not know each other is just not credible. I think if i were bin Laden, i would have said to Cheney: Hey man, why don't you take the risks. It would have far more impact if you were to become a TERR0RIST MENACE and with your heart, you can't have that many good years left in you anyway.

[madman101]

all-kkaiida was created by the USA / see-eye-aye to fight Russia in Afghanistan. that is now conventional wisdom. apparently, it was also commandeered later by profiteers and strategists associated with the latter, and soon became a convenient straw man to justify more illegal wars into other countries. B-Laden was associated with the latter.

the stats on how much of the world's wealth the "1%" hold are overwhelming and available online. their money, which is capital got from the sweat of labour, and now invested perversely and predominantly into the financial sector, and the war economy, holds almost endless sway and promise to millions and millions and MILLIONS of people.

bin-laden did not necessarilly belong to a terriblist organisation. that was the script we were give to read. we believed it. by doing so, we enabled the vacuuming away of much of our wealth into the pockets of the global permanent war economy, including war, oil and bank contractors.

among my enemies?

[bobby1933]

Certainly not! Why would you consider such a thing.
Besides. i have sworn to love my enemies.

Re: among my enemies?

[madman101]

i have this "problem" of considering EVERYTHING, ha ha! - sorry if it was not applicable

take care