Blu-Ray

May 13, 2012 17:54

I just got my first Blu-Ray disc, Terminator 2. My reactions to it as technology ( Read more... )

tv, tech

Leave a comment

Comments 14

billroper May 13 2012, 23:45:16 UTC
Are you running the sound through your home stereo? If so, do you have a center speaker? If not, is there a setting that will emulate a center speaker or, alternatively, which will set a preference for speech or dialogue on your TV or stereo?

The problem is that the music and special effects are strongly coded for stereo, but the speech is strongly coded for a center speaker. If you don't have a center speaker or the center speaker is balanced too low, you'll have trouble hearing the dialogue.

Reply

madfilkentist May 14 2012, 00:53:43 UTC
Maybe that's it. I'm using my stereo for sound but there's no center speaker. I'll look at the audio settings on the disc.

Reply


lisande May 14 2012, 06:20:47 UTC
We have a Blu-Ray player for about a year now, and we think carefully about which movie is worth having as a Blu-Ray. So far we've found that animated movies are always worth the higher costs of a Blu-Ray, "normal" movies aren't unless they have a strong emphasis on the pictures (like Lord of the Rings).

And old movies aren't worth it because the technology just wasn't what it is today.

Reply

madfilkentist May 14 2012, 09:36:13 UTC
Terminator 2 was from the $5 rack, so cost wasn't a problem.

Reply

lisande May 15 2012, 20:46:15 UTC
Agreed. :)

Reply

eyalmozes May 14 2012, 13:02:56 UTC
And old movies aren't worth it because the technology just wasn't what it is today.

That's interesting. I don't own a Blu-ray player, so I can't comment from experience; but friends of mine who have seen Metropolis on Blu-ray say it really is a noticeable improvement over the DVD.

Of course, the question is what exactly you mean by "old movies". For movies from the 1980s and 1990s, you're probably right. But for movies from the 1910s thru the 1960s, probably even the 1970s, the analog film that was used then actually had an extremely high resolution, even higher than the best digital video technology of today. The high resolution was wasted on the projection equipment available at the time; but it makes sense that these films might gain a lot from being viewed with the high-resolution technology we have today.

Reply


ron_newman May 14 2012, 10:05:43 UTC
Why did it need to connect to the Internet? Does it try to download trailers or other supplementary material?

Reply

stevemb May 14 2012, 11:18:41 UTC
I'm guessing it has to do with "A note in the package warns that if the disc is newer than my player, I might need to get a software update for it to play properly."

Reply

madfilkentist May 14 2012, 13:09:30 UTC
Since I didn't connect, I don't know, but it implied that I'd get better, or at least different, menu options if I were connected.

Reply


eyalmozes May 14 2012, 12:50:48 UTC
Wherever I have a choice, I'll stick with DVD.

Are there any cases in which you don't have a choice? I'm not aware of any movies available on Blu-ray and not on DVD; are there any?

Reply

madfilkentist May 14 2012, 13:09:58 UTC
I don't know of any today, but it's likely there will be in the future.

Reply


sodyera May 15 2012, 15:41:02 UTC
I have TWO(2) Blu-Ray DVDs and the computer runaround associated with getting a playable DVD hard copy for "STAR TREK" was SO bad that I spent money on a strictly DVD-format copy, which plays with no problems. I'm with you, DVD all the way.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up