DOMA and Prop 8 Struck Down - But Still a Stateside Mess

Jun 26, 2013 13:15

I've looked at the rulings handed down, and I realize that, while recognizing the discriminatory nature of both Prop 8 and DOMA is good, the Supreme Court did not extend it to the states ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

jordan179 June 26 2013, 17:49:30 UTC
Nah. This will give states which allow gay marriage a competitive advantage over states which do not allow gay marriage, because more gays will move to pro- gay marriage states than anti- ones. As gays are on the average more talented and have higher incomes than non-gays, this will disadvantage the anti-gay marriage states in subtle ways which will hurt their national influence. This is how the Federal system was designed to work.

Reply

maddogairpirate June 26 2013, 17:52:14 UTC
I don't see that as being remotely practical, nor the way it works. People relocate, and their marriage status is going to be a mess of red tape and arguments.

I get it that the Supreme Court didn't want to be heavy-handed. It's just going to create a big mess.

Reply


sonious June 26 2013, 18:13:06 UTC
Ironically Kennedy, while speaking for the majority in overturning DOMA. His vote on Prop 8 was actually pro-prop 8, basically saying that the popular law insertion's purpose was to circumvent the power structure to pass laws that would otherwise not be implemented at the local level. It's a giant step forward though, given that it used to be married gay couples in states where it was legal would not get any of the benefits straight married couples got. I think that was the "discrimination" they were talking about, two different marriages in states that say you can get married and should have the same rights.

Both decisions seem to show that they are more in tuned with state governments than federal government/ populous movements. So:

If a state government still says no, that's still going to be no.
If a crowd of people vote to say 'no', and the state says 'yes' that means yes.
If the federal government says 'no' and the state says 'yes', that means yes.

Reply

mlknchz June 26 2013, 20:48:07 UTC
and yet Federal anti-marijuana laws still trump state law.....odd

Reply

sonious June 26 2013, 21:06:27 UTC
That hasn't gotten to the Supreme Court yet, something tells me if it did the results would probably be similar to DOMA.

Reply


dcseain June 26 2013, 18:54:42 UTC
I agree with you.

Reply


wolff_slaven July 1 2013, 14:48:54 UTC
Just a random note, Disney Movie Club released the next Talespin DVD. (That and Gargoyles 2 v. 2 FINALLY). But it's only for DMC peeps. Luckily I signed up years ago. I ordered both. But knowing you were into Talespin, wanted to pass that info along.

Reply

maddogairpirate July 1 2013, 21:53:47 UTC
It's being shipped as we speak. Thanks though. =)

Reply

wolff_slaven July 2 2013, 14:46:35 UTC
Haha cool. Yeah mine should be here next week.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up