Status

Aug 19, 2010 18:59

Meh. So ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

oniugnip August 21 2010, 16:37:52 UTC
Those sound like pretty great math classes :)

Reply

lyceum_arabica August 23 2010, 15:52:03 UTC
The graphs one claims to include a decent amount of coding, so perhaps I'm not missing out entirely. :-)

Reply


cmd_bakotl August 22 2010, 02:06:23 UTC
css is overrated :P

Reply

lyceum_arabica August 23 2010, 15:51:13 UTC
:-) I made a group website that uses css, but apparently not as well as it could? I had a friend beg to redo the code, and then do so. So now I'm thinking that I'd like a better grip on what style css is supposed to have before I use it on the website people check when they want to give me jobs. Right now we can just go with simple and robust.

Reply


lindseykuper September 3 2010, 04:11:17 UTC
I managed to miss this earlier -- here are some belated thoughts on the website:

1) On the web, I try to avoid using underlining for anything except links -- otherwise people will see the underline, think it's a link, and try in vain to click on it. If you want to add emphasis, use boldness or size or color.

2) The "graph-mining algorithms" link is broken.

3) If you're doing lists for "Recommended Secret Weapons" and so on, why not also have your favorite poets in a list, for consistency?

4) isn't going to work in most browsers. You want . Ideally, you probably want to offload all style information into a separate style sheet. Feel free to borrow mine (and tweak it as much as you want for your own purposes). But I also think that a web page can look really great and classy with no CSS whatsoever ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up