21 March, 2029 2012: Sooo....apparently somewhere between LJ changing their update.bml page, and me changing my journal's name, my ability to post got temporarily fucked. Something didn't like the fact that my journal's date is 17 years in the future, and so posts were getting "delayed" until 2029 actually hit. Which means A) that I need to be
(
Read more... )
Comments 17
Reply
It doesn't really matter what you (or I, for that matter) think the risks are to someone de-closeting about something. There is no objective risk measurement at all. For each individual, there is a relationship between perceived risk and the resources they have available to handle that risk.
There are still openly and oppressively Christian employers in this country, and plenty of careers where limiting your employers can be costly. And if your current employer is one of them, facing the possibility of losing your job is stressful, even if other employers wouldn't care. The way we combine health care and job positions can leave a family in a precarious position if a parent has to change employers, even if they're not unemployed.
Reply
These are determinations of county, not state, and about individual judges (and usually unless someone does something openly egregious that gets wide notice, they stay on the bench), not about what kind of person normally gets elected into state or local office.
Reply
I'm lurving the term "broom closet."
Reply
Reply
It was devastating. Most people don't understand. They think, it's just trees. But, it was more than that.
So I emphasize, sincerely, and *hugs offered*
Regarding privilege and the closet, I fully agree, and it's a definite problem. My girlfriend's boyfriend lost custody of his children for being poly, nearly permanently, and it wasn't until his girlfriend and her husband had moved out of state and he told the judge he was no longer with her that the judge would ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Also, good essay about closeting.
Reply
Leave a comment