Sep 04, 2008 08:58
I don't get it. Why is Palin being compared to Obama? Shouldn't it be McCain compared to Obama while Palin is compared to Biden? What makes her vice-president candidacy as important as Obama's presidential candidacy?
Leave a comment
Comments 16
give me a BREAK.
Reply
Also, this one fact really bugs me. How the media and pundits are questioning whether Palin can be a mother and the VP. While no one has ever questioned if Obama can be a father and the President. It is sexism, plan and simple.
Reply
and that point was all over the morning news shows. i personally don't think it has much steam. yeah, they're talking about it now, but just wait; something else will come along and it, too, will fade to the wayside.
other than those points, what did you think of her speech?
Reply
I understand that you personally think she isn't qualified but historically presidential candidates have been governors not senators. Governers are executive positions while senators are legislative positions. Unfortunately, neither candidate for president has executive experience. Palin is the only one of the four that does so I don't agree with your assessment of her qualifications.
Reply
Reply
Just don't get the direct Obama/Palin comparisions.
Reply
Like I said I haven't seen much direct Obama-Palin (I've typed Palin so many times it doesn't look real any more) comparing- though I have seen a LOT of questioning of her record separately. But it might be a media thing too- in a sense, McCain, Obama, and Biden have all been 'vetted' by the media- people know enough about them. But Palin is an unknown quantity, and so there's a lot for the media to dig into, for better or worse- and that sells advertisements and gets viewers and all that.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment