oh, man -- we've been looking for a decent hosting company for years, and we are as yet unsatisfied. we're currently on Hostmonster (same as BlueHost -- see which one is cheaper this week) and have been rankled by their downtime (better in the last few weeks, finally). branchandroot has one other idea waiting in the wings, but I forget who they are.
He does have servers for lease as well as virtual servers. Each domain is on a separate virtual environment. I thought that would meet the criteria. As it is a for profit idea, that would be a problem. Most of the MSPs I've dealt with deal with NFP or large enterprises only. To lease a full server is generally going to be expensive, given the MSPs I've dealt with (SAVVIS being one of them).
I suppose that depends on what you call expensive. I'm getting mine for $70/mo, I saw lower end boxes for around $45/mo. Yes, that's a whole machine to myself.
Many customers have been completely satisfied with the results of Managed hosting. Given the variety of hosting options available, this alternative deducts the grueling management responsibilities of maintaining a server and network.
Comments 12
Reply
Reply
Good luck!
Reply
Reply
I used Dreamhost for over a year now, and found them to be pretty fabulous.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Many customers have been completely satisfied with the results of Managed hosting. Given the variety of hosting options available, this alternative deducts the grueling management responsibilities of maintaining a server and network.
Reply
Leave a comment