This is a rather long reply to a post from
ciphergoth. The question being, is it plausible that, in future, we will be able to resurrect people from their head, cryonically frozen post-mortemI am keenly interested in the prospect of whole-brain emulation, which strikes me as potentially plausible, with reasonable probability. For one thing, I think that this
(
Read more... )
Comments 119
Reply
And in the nature, as someone else put it, of Pascal's Wager, well, if you can afford to do it, then definitely do; there is no real downside.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Research has suggested that long term memory storage in humans may be regulated by DNA methylation.
That's a real oh-shit problem in my view - getting all the methyl groups right on the dna of at least a good proportion of someone's neurons strikes me as showstopper. DNA methylation not being involved in brain functioning would make the data extraction much easier.
Reply
Wouldn't surprise me if you're bang on, though!
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
The only cavil is that if you do this for everybody, or more or less everybody, and store all the data just in case, then possibly, /post facto/, one can decide who was a great genius, unappreciated in their time, and bring 'em back later on. This presupposes that data storage continues to get cheaper & cheaper, which is, I think, one of the safest bets in the whole general area under discussion.
Reply
Reply
Reply
So I'm hoping you'll take the fourth step, of explicitly discussing the arguments set out by cryonics advocates on the subjects you discuss - you're clearly much better placed to evaluate them than I am. For example, you say:However, the prospects of doing it from a dead brain seem to me to be far closer to 0, in a Zeno's-Paradox sort of way. Once one is outside that critical 4min window of an oxygen-deprived brain, I suspect that the remaining amount of useful information drops precipitately, with every passing minute, and after 2-3x that 4min window, I suspect there isn't enough left to be worthwhile.
I'm guessing you're thinking of ischemic damage? This issue is discussed in detail in Scientific Justification of Cryonics Practice which is the document to rebut if you're interested in this subject. Fahy's cited study on ( ... )
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(This is the point at which scepticism becomes laborious.)
Reply
[2] Freezing the brain inside that period, without damaging it - major implementation difficulty here.
[3] Implicit in #2, a preservation method that preserves the structures or patterns that encode the mind in question. Currently more or less impossible to say, as we don't know what structures or patterns those are.
[4] Sampling the result with fine enough resolution to retrieve useful amounts of info.
[5] Finding a way to process, implement or run the resultant dataset in a way that will effectively resurrect the consciousness.
[1] and [2] I've discussed above - it currently looks to me as though existing cryonics best practice will suffice.
[3] Again, I refer you to "Scientific Justification", in particular this bit. If Best is overreaching here that would be an excellent observation to post ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment