As I've doubtless bored people silly with for years, another of my non-computery interests is languages and linguistics. One subsection of this is conlangs: constructed languages, as opposed to natural languages
( Read more... )
"Familiar" is perhaps a bit bit strong, but I've /heard/ of it. :¬) I've not really looked into it, though.
Chinese can function like that, as a purely written language; one of my lecturers at university, the late Dr Nan Duncan, could read and write Chinese well enough to have papers published in Chinese journals on her specialist subject - freshwater limnology - and get invited over there to give some talks at a conference. She accepted but stressed that she spoke no Chinese whatsoever.
They didn't believe her, so when she arrived, no interpreter was available and she had to communicate entirely in writing with them. Apparently, giving the speeches was quite a trial, with a Chinese domain specialist doing the technical terms and a hired interpreter doing the rest of the words...
Actually, no, I didn't know that, but then I don't really speak Nihongo. I can't get much further than introducing myself politely. I hope to remedy this some day.
But fascinating as your comment is - no, seriously, not taking the mickey - it doesn't substantially change my point.
Comments 26
Reply
It was nicked out of a conversation I was involved in on CIX, so I fear its flow is less than ideal, but I'm glad it entertained.
Reply
I trust that you're familiar with BlissSymbolics - an entirely written conlang rather than a spoken one.
Reply
Chinese can function like that, as a purely written language; one of my lecturers at university, the late Dr Nan Duncan, could read and write Chinese well enough to have papers published in Chinese journals on her specialist subject - freshwater limnology - and get invited over there to give some talks at a conference. She accepted but stressed that she spoke no Chinese whatsoever.
They didn't believe her, so when she arrived, no interpreter was available and she had to communicate entirely in writing with them. Apparently, giving the speeches was quite a trial, with a Chinese domain specialist doing the technical terms and a hired interpreter doing the rest of the words...
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
But fascinating as your comment is - no, seriously, not taking the mickey - it doesn't substantially change my point.
Reply
Reply
But my general thrust, which is that in daily use Japanese does perfectly well without all this stuff, stands, I think... no?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Lots of decks & things on the /Red Dwarf/, mind... :¬)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment