Hello, internet. I hope that making my first post of the year a movie review would be a fortuitous move. So, my thoughts on yaoi Sherlock Holmes!
Kate Beaton puts Dr. John Watson into perspective Little things that surprised me:
- The lovely banter between different characters.
"You experiment on my dog--"
"Our dog."
"The dog."
ASDFdshfl;
(
Read more... )
Comments 37
Twitter! a;k; (<-- my keymash knows what's on my mind...) I am scared of twitter, but I check it every...erm, month or so. Will you be using twitter from now on? :Db
Reply
Screaming at Twitter. I'm already on Plurk so I'm not sure if I could sustain more than one microblogging account. Also I kind of don't know anyone on Twitter. Adf;aj;lfja
Reply
Me! Me! :D You know me! ......and your sister, presumably >>
Reply
Adhljd;fas I guess I know someone now. My sister is so creepily enthusiastic about website accounts. She keeps bugging me to get a Tumblr. It's such a relief that she doesn't find LJ trendy and therefore worthy of her time.
What's your Twitter username? Mine's twitter.com / sofedorable
Reply
I found the plot 'lacking' in that the resolution of the mystery was a letdown. I think they overused the ~magical properties of new discoveries~, which resulted in uninteresting and too convenient explanations for the incidences. Something that hinged more on manipulation of the situation, which would've required a more interesting use of logic, would've been stronger. Though this didn't detract from my enjoyment much. =X
Reply
Hmm, I get what you mean, but I thought the "normalizing" of the ~magic~ was the function of many detective stories. Like, Detective Conan uses this a lot. Even Agatha Christie. Which is to say that I took the letdown as part of the "detective story" as a genre and rolled with it. XD
Reply
lol. Holmes. Is there going to be a sequel? A trilogy!
Reply
Reply
On the way home we talked about the movie (yet again,) and my take on it was that I liked the movie overall for all the references made to the source material in summary. Like that inspector?policeman? that sided often with Holmes, and quickly reported all the details. Or Holmes' violin (which reminded me of how House was with his Ball-- he looooooooooooves them ballssssssss.--) Ahem.
Anyway, it's funny how for the most part we were also comparing the movie with House M.D.
As a sidenote: House does not need to get punched often. He's already in pain.
P.S. also: not an addict.
Reply
I think the version is very postmodern (Oh God, I've become that douche who uses that word in normal conversations) in that it references a whole bunch of shit, it also manipulates time and space perception. I really really really liked the dialogue! I think the weakest parts of the movie were those of the secret society, I guess because I missed the double entendres.
Oh, I forgot that about House. I guess taking that into account (pain to asshole ration computation, hrmm...) I would be okay with having House punched in the face every five episodes. :D? :D? :D?
Who is not an addict? I thought that the movie made it very clear about Holmes' tendency towards addiction.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The comparison is kind of inevitable, innit? People would be far happier if they'd only compare Sherlock Holmes to House instead of the other adaptations. It's a much fairer comparison since they're created in the same generation.
I'm eternally sad that Jude Law has turned back into his metrosexual look. :(
Reply
That said, I approve of this post.
Reply
I think the words you're stringing together should add up to three: "Jude" + "Law" + "stache"
Reply
Aaaaaah I wanna watch it again. Just for moustachey Jude Law. >_<)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment