This time I made sure I used en_lj

[ridicully]

Lots of little things.
In FAQ # 145: Basic information on overrides can be found at [FAQ 124]
In the same FAQ, should there be a link to the page in there If the Modify Journal page is?
This FAQ also switches a lot between "Paid, Permanent and Earl Adopter", "Paid" and "Paid and Permanent" but this is probably deliberate.
And it links to FAQ # 171

Comments

[camomiletea]

First it should be "en_LJ" capitalized that way or it won't work.

Paid, Permanent, Early Adopter vs. Paid and Permananet is deliberate.

Linking to Modify page makes sense. I'll leave it to isabeau or someone else to fix that and the [FAQ 124] thing, though. I can't come up with a descriptive way to link to 124, the way that sentence is set up, I would just put "this page" or something...

[ridicully]

First it should be "en_LJ" capitalized
Oh god, thank you. I thought I was going crazy when I could't see the changes I was sure should be there.

Paid, Permanent, Early Adopter vs. Paid and Permananet is deliberate.
And the switch from Paid and Permanent to just Paid? Just curious, *I* certainly don't understand all the differences between those.

[camomiletea]

Oh... I think we just didn't want to always mention the three types of accounts, and when it talks of "paid-only", "paid account benefit" (not capitalizing Paid), it includes all three. When it talks separately listing out the types of accounts, they are capitalized (Paid, Permanent and Early Adopter Accounts). I think, that's what it is... Basically, there aren't that many Permanent and Early Adopters, and they know that they pretty much have the same features as Paid.

[isabeau]

FAQ 145 is fixed for the FAQ thing and the Modify Journal link; thanks. Not changing the link to FAQ 171 because linking directly to the s2howto entries would also require a description of what they are, which would basically be a duplication of the information in FAQ 171. (And if the information ever gets moved to another place, or if an additional entry or chart or something gets added, I don't want to have to change it in both FAQs *G*)

Oh, and the FAQ 226 thing? It's because people call lj-cut/lj user/etc "tags", and so might look under "Tags" for information. (there have been several requests that start out as "How do I use tags?", get horribly muddled in the middle when we tell them about tags, and finally it's sorted out that they mean lj-cut tags and not tag tags.)

[ridicully]

Thanks for the info. I was wondering if it was something like that :)