I've always wondered why syncevents would be used in the first place. In MultiLJ's History dialog, I use the "getevents" call, and have had no problems with it. Then again, I've not tried a stress test of the size that you're talking about.
One of the things on my "Programming projects I'll get to one of these days..." list is a LiveJournal archiving program. That's probably the point that syncevents vs. getevents would be compared and contrasted.
According to the protocol guide, syncitems is preferable to getevents because syncitems can return a much larger number of items and therefore requires fewer calls. Apparently the overhead per call is high.
Check out my ljdump program for one way to do an LJ archiver. In the source comments I noted some problem I had with syncitems so it looks like I used a combination of syncitems and getevents. I don't recall the details, but what I did might provide some insight.
Comments 3
One of the things on my "Programming projects I'll get to one of these days..." list is a LiveJournal archiving program. That's probably the point that syncevents vs. getevents would be compared and contrasted.
Raven
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment