subversion

Apr 07, 2006 16:47

We're now using Subversion instead of CVS. Everything's been imported into ( Read more... )

multicvs, cvs, svn

Leave a comment

Comments 12

vxjasonxv April 8 2006, 00:00:04 UTC
I love the irony in people using ViewCVS for SVN.

I thought the need for ViewCVS is mitigated by the use of Trac?

Reply

dottedmag April 8 2006, 04:26:14 UTC
ViewCVS' new name is ViewVC.

Reply

vxjasonxv April 8 2006, 15:19:54 UTC
Would that happen to be short for View View Code?
:D

Thanks for that info. Though you just KILLED my irony :(.

Reply

Re: Reply to your comment... dottedmag April 8 2006, 15:45:45 UTC
View Version Control. And I think authors of ViewCVS also got your irony in the past :)

Reply


froznsoulonfire April 8 2006, 00:47:42 UTC
awesome.

./4 n G3L/

Reply


kunzite1 April 8 2006, 06:08:08 UTC
care to share why SVN version numbers aren't linear? makes no sense to me.

Reply

kunzite1 April 8 2006, 07:05:19 UTC
after reading, they're per-commit.

makes it more difficult to read on the individual log pages if you ask me. :\

Reply

iamo April 8 2006, 07:31:18 UTC
That's one of the things that's better about perforce than subversion. It keeps both counts.

But if I had to choose between the two, I'd easily choose the global version number with atomic multi-file commits. Everything is so much better with that. Logs are just a minor annoyance in comparison.

Reply


mart April 8 2006, 09:59:11 UTC

This is nice, but I continue to wonder why LJ's multicvs file pulls out memcached, perlbal, gearman, etc… separate things which aren't actually used by the LiveJournal code at all. Do you really run in production with that directory structure?

Reply


mart April 8 2006, 10:16:37 UTC

If you're going to set up Trac for the LiveJournal respositories, could you make the tool that commits to changelog apply something resembling Trac's wiki markup? Specifically I'm interested in the auto-linkification of things like changeset:1543, but just in general it'd be nice to have some consistency between the two. (perhaps extended slightly to also have support for linking to tickets on RequestTracker!)

Reply

crucially April 9 2006, 21:52:29 UTC
I am going to install RTx::SVN integration so you can update tickets using markup..

I guess we could pretty much replace changelog with a syndicated feed?

Reply

burr86 April 10 2006, 03:37:30 UTC
Won't allow for posts to have differing public/protected security, though. :-/

Reply


Leave a comment

Up