Hunger Striking Against Solitary Confinement

Aug 27, 2013 21:21

I read today about the California prisoners who've gone without food for 45 days now to protest the practice of keeping people on solitary for a year or more. A judge decided that the prisons can force feed them. This is barbarism. Their rationale is that some of the fasting prisoners have been mislead. I almost expect to hear the Shrubism: " ( Read more... )

life, california, fasting, psych, rights, suicide, madness, prisons, isolation, law, adulthood

Leave a comment

Comments 4

ford_prefect42 August 28 2013, 15:37:24 UTC
Well, prison time isn't *supposed* to be pleasant. It's supposed to be a deterrent against doing things that get you sent there! Frankly, it isn't even supposed to be humane!

However, I agree with you that they shouldn't be force-fed. One of the most important aspects of freedom is the freedom to screw things up.

And Obama uses "wrongheaded" WAY more than shrub ever did.

Reply

liveonearth August 28 2013, 23:46:01 UTC
Absolutely. The freedom to end it seems integral to the freedom to exist in the first place.

As for whether or not we want to be humane in our treatment of prisoners; I agree that decent treatment does not matter if the only purpose of prison is deterrence. But there is this other idea that criminals might be rehabilitated, might somehow be of value in the future. If there is a chance that a person could be brought back to responsible citizenship and personhood, then doing things that destroy their psyche is counter productive. I would like to think that some people go to prison and come out better, instead of worse, than they were when they went in. I happen to know a few individuals who would say this is true for them....and are grateful. This seems to be increasingly rare....

Reply

ford_prefect42 August 29 2013, 04:00:36 UTC
I hear you, but the thing is, i know of 2the circumstances where someone will be kept in solitary. First is someone that has a history if horrible crimes while in prison. Killing guards or other inmates, etc. The other is "supermax" where the very most dangerous prisoners are quartered. Was there ever a chance of rehabilitating ted bundy?

And even there, "solitary" doesn't mean "solitary", it means they can still talk and interact with their neighbors, but they don't go to the yard or have a cellmate.

Reply

liveonearth August 29 2013, 15:43:12 UTC
Bundy and those like him who cannot be remediated are the ones who might be best dead, not imprisoned. It is unfortunate that our system incurs such grand expense to execute an inmate.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up