The Thought Police are here

Nov 26, 2012 09:58

How disgusting that Rotherham social services think taking away children from perfectly good Foster parents is acceptable if they dont agree with their political opinions! Didn't Franco and Stalin do the same thing, just on a much larger scale?
This from the same council that got caught turning a blind eye to the child sex abuse ring active right in ( Read more... )

politics

Leave a comment

Comments 69

a_pawson November 26 2012, 10:16:50 UTC
Hang a minute, it's not just any political opinion though. The problem is it says in UKIP manifesto that they want to "end the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government". That statement is bordering on racism, so I can understand why the social workers would be concerned about membership of an organisation with that policy, particularly when they are placing children of a different ethnic origin.

Reply

the_jubjub_bird November 26 2012, 11:52:55 UTC
So Cameron is a racist? He said the "multiculturalism doesn't work". Being against multiculturalism doesn't make one a racist. The viable alternative is integration and "melting pot".

Reply

adcott November 26 2012, 12:09:28 UTC
Equating not being supportive of multiculturalism with racism isn't really fair.

Reply

ellonwye November 26 2012, 12:35:55 UTC
It is at the very least xenophobic.

Reply


akcipitrokulo November 26 2012, 10:44:29 UTC
I'm not 100% sure how I feel about this one - I would say that if you have views that "people like you shouldn't be in this country" towards the child(ren) you are fostering, then it could be problematic, especially as kids in care often have self-esteem issues anyway. I also think that "but *you* are different of course, we don't mean that about *you* ... (just everyone else like you)" REALLY doesn't make it better.

Reply

adcott November 26 2012, 11:56:50 UTC
They were members of UKIP, not the BNP.

UKIP aren't anti-immigration, they're for capped immigration with no distinction of the country of origin. Kind of like the Tory party but ignoring the separate rules for the EU.

I'm not a UKIP supporter but there's a lot of implied racism here, which really isn't fair. There's nothing to suggest that they hold views like "people like you shouldn't be in this country".

Reply

67 November 26 2012, 12:17:30 UTC
'The tide of mass EU immigration has pushed down wages and restricted job opportunities. Only by leaving the EU can we regain control of our borders.

• Freeze permanent immigration for 5 years. Immigrants must be fluent in English, have minimum education levels and show they can financially support themselves.'

'• Our traditional values have been undermined. Children are taught to be ashamed of our past. Multiculturalism has split our society. Political correctness is stifling free speech.'

well...

Reply

ockhamsadvocate November 26 2012, 12:25:21 UTC
Thats not racism at all, and any attempt to label it as such is specious at the least.

Reply


ellonwye November 26 2012, 10:45:55 UTC
You seem to have gotten lost. Surely you meant to post this in the Daily Mail comments section?

Reply

alicephilippa November 26 2012, 10:58:47 UTC
MTE

Reply

the_jubjub_bird November 26 2012, 11:53:54 UTC
Are you the local mod, or the thought policeman?

Reply

nightfall404 November 26 2012, 12:16:11 UTC
I think it probably stops being the domain of the though police once you publish it on a public forum.

Kinda like how you can't libel someone in your head.

Reply


radiantsoul November 26 2012, 11:03:11 UTC
I am guess their failures in previous scandals have lead to a risk averse attitude and this may have resulted in a more trigger happy attitude with respect to removing children from foster parents.

I guess we don't know what other details that the council had on the couple as well.

Reply

optimus_stoo November 26 2012, 15:51:22 UTC
Yeah I'm wondering if there's something more we don't know about. If these people have been fostering for 7 years, and I assume they've not kept their politics a secret. Why were they given "not indigenous white British" kids in the first place.

Reply


biascut November 26 2012, 11:03:21 UTC
Didn't Franco and Stalin do the same thing, just on a much larger scale?

Yes, yes, saying that you can't foster children is exactly what Franco and Stalin did, only on a much larger scale.

Reply

the_jubjub_bird November 26 2012, 12:00:12 UTC
Don't know about Franco but Stalin was against fostering. He preferred the State orphanages for the children of those who were proclaimed "the Enemies of the People". And anyone not agreeing with the State ideology would be proclaimed "the Enemy of the People" and sent to GULAG. The Labour have curious predecessors.

Reply

biascut November 26 2012, 12:01:45 UTC
"The Labour"?!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up