Scenario: A plane crashes while on approach to
East Midlands Airport in the UK. The plane was meant to be a long haul transatlantic flight from Heathrow, but it declared an emergency and was directed to East Midlands (its runway is the same length as Robin Hood Sheffield/Doncaster Airport's, which boasts it can land an Antonov-225, which is much
(
Read more... )
Comments 21
Reply
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=kegworth+air+crash&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&gws_rd=cr&ei=okzMUtfJB4rH7Aalg4CQCg
Reply
Reply
Reply
There is an article about the survivors on the BBC at the moment. You may wish to read it, OP, but some people might find it quite harrowing.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-25548016
Reply
Reply
It seems fairly usual for local people/people who are present at major incidents to give assistance. There was a good deal of assistance from residents after the Lockerbie disaster (though of course there was a lot of impact on the ground there so people were engaged anyway), but looking at major incidents that I've checked at random (Grayrigg derailment, recent Glasgow helicopter crash), it looks like assistant isn't unusual when you have an accident that happens outside a major site such as a station/airport, and where there aren't dedicated facilities already.
Reply
Long final is anything 8 Nautical Miles (over 9 miles) out from the runway, down to about 4nm, when it becomes final, then short final... anyway, digressing! The point is, I can't imagine any airport continuing to take landing flights if something has crashed on final approach - there could be explosions, smoke, not to mention the fear factor for any pilots/passengers seeing a crashed plane below!!
Anyway, very long way of saying that I think the airport fire crews would be free to attend, if they were needed, given they have all the damping down foam on board, which a regular fire engine wouldn't have.
Unless that doesn't suit your plot, OP, in which case ignore me ;)
Reply
How big are airport fire trucks compared to regular ones, because the two canal bridges on the most direct routes from EMA to the crash site are just about wide enough to take a regular one.
Reply
It would surely depend on the type of aircraft and cargo, but if you're talking about a large airliner a few tens of thousands of gallons is pretty reasonable. A B747-400 would probably carry something like 70% of its maximum fuel capacity for a typical LHR-JFK run. A quick calculation for a 7.5 hour flight gives me 34,000 lbs for taxi to climb, 188,000 lbs for cruise and landing, and a 30,000 lbs reserve. That's about 252,000 lbs or 37,500 gal.
How quickly would he be able to dump enough of this fuel to make a safe landing at East Midlands?Only airliners that are certified to take off at weights greater than they can land are equipped with fuel dumping systems. The B747-400 has one, as do most heavy aircraft of that era, but they're less common in later aircraft as it becomes more practical ( ... )
Reply
I dug up a handful of aviation incident reports for off-airport crashes but none mention which agencies were involved in the emergency response nor when they arrived, so I'm curious about the range of airport fire service as well.
Reply
Reply
This. I hadn't realised it was the anniversary until I saw that same BBC article today, but my mind had already gone straight to the Kegworth crash when you posted this scenario. Please reconsider.
Reply
Leave a comment