Analysis of spontaneous speech error?

Jul 19, 2012 22:50

[I am a native speaker of American English ( Read more... )

grammar, american english

Leave a comment

Comments 11

tenou_k July 20 2012, 04:39:14 UTC
Ahah, in the middle of an ESL class at the end of a very long eight hour day, I said "It look goods."

Clearly, not qualified to be using my own language, let alone teach it. *facepalm*

Reply

raendrop July 20 2012, 20:08:58 UTC
Surely, spontaneous speech errors don't count against fundamental proficiency. I must wonder about this mythical creature who's never experienced a tip of the slung. :)

Reply


provencepuss July 20 2012, 07:34:18 UTC
a slip of the tongue and nothing more; hey I have still been known to say hopsital and as for hippo....hoppo....hoppopitamus....hippopotamus...it's too early in the morning!

Reply


lizwinlove July 20 2012, 13:03:29 UTC
I have a terrible habit of trying to get out an eight or nine word sentence in the speed it ought to take me to speak only three. This often results in the garbled speech you can imagine. Mine is not linguistically related, mine is a habit of being ignored for so long in social situations that I imagine I must make my point in a very small amount of time because you won't waste the amount of time it ought to take me to say what I need to say. I really ought to get over that.

Reply

raendrop July 20 2012, 19:50:49 UTC
Oh, I hear you there. The number of times I've been interrupted and talked over... Maybe we should form a support group!

Reply


zougla July 20 2012, 14:27:22 UTC
It depends who you ask. I think some people in syntax and processing would say there was a mistake in the "merging" of the past tense ending to the wrong head (onto the subject rather than the verb). Meaning there was a processing error in your grammar as you were building up the sentence.

Some others may call it a phonological metathesis, or a motor programming error as you were pronouncing the sentence.

I think calling it a "slip" though covers all these possibilities.

Reply

raendrop July 20 2012, 20:16:18 UTC
That was my line of thought, or would have been were I able to translate the mentalese into English.

Reply


philena July 20 2012, 16:41:28 UTC
I've heard this sort of thing called "anticipatory speech error" where you pronounce something coming up in the sentence (namely, the final [d]) earlier than you should. I'd argue, however, that it's not a metathesis, as you're not changing the order of any sounds. You're simply adding a sound that doesn't belong.

Reply

raendrop July 20 2012, 20:05:41 UTC
Granted, metathesis is typically exemplified by "hopsital" for "hospital", "gaspetti" for "spaghetti", "axe" for "ask", or even "Mardon me, padam, but this pie is occupewed. May I sew you to another sheet?" But surely a case can be made for the transposition of a terminal consonant with null, particularly when both "shaped" and "looked" are valid lexical constructions?

Reply

philena July 21 2012, 23:58:10 UTC
Hmmm. I see the point. (Actually, I think I misread the original error as "the shaped looked odd.") I would still argue, however, that this isn't (classic) metathesis, as what's being transposed is not really phonemes, but morphemes. The past-tense [t] from the verb is being misplaced on the noun.

Although in this particular case it is true that a single phoneme has been moved around, I think it's more interesting that this phoneme also corresponds to a complete morpheme. This ability to misplace single morphemes has been the source of theories of speech production that say that we choose word roots at one stage of production, and then add appropriate inflectional morphology at a different stage, and finally phonologically encode them. (Phonological encoding is the stage at which we decide that the same past tense morpheme can be pronounced as [d] on a verb like fill but as [t] on a verb like look). In the OP's case, lexical selection was fine; it was the inflectional process that went bonkers. Since metathesis is traditionally a ( ... )

Reply

raendrop July 22 2012, 00:11:56 UTC
I have nothing to add except I love your use of the word "bonkers" and the kitty in your avatar. Thank you for so beautifully answering my questions.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up