complicated grammar structure, or just wrong?

Feb 24, 2011 19:31

'kay guys, need a grammaticality judgement here:
*eyes you, haven't having had dessert yet*

Leave a comment

Comments 28

trinker February 25 2011, 02:15:05 UTC
"have not having had" is a horrible mashup of grammar exercises, not a grammatically correct phrase. ;)q

Reply

smirnoffmule February 25 2011, 02:43:04 UTC
Do you think haven't having been to the bank, she had no money is incorrect? I'm wondering if this might be a regionalism, because it's certainly a construction I've heard before, albeit a bit clumsily used here.

Reply

trinker February 25 2011, 02:58:28 UTC
O.O ?!

Where is that a regionalism? That's fascinatingly weird. I've never heard that before, and I've been traveling around a bunch of the U.S. in recent years. I've also never heard it from an ESL speaker, although I won't claim my encounters (although highly varied) are exhaustive.

Just checked google: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22haven't+having+been%22 and I find *two* separate uses, out of 7 hits. (The others are either repeats of the same sentence, or broken across two sentences.)

Are you mishearing something, or is this something that people can't bring themselves to write, even if they say it? Or are you hearing it as something they don't think they're saying?

Reply

smirnoffmule February 25 2011, 03:02:45 UTC
I'm British. I don't think I've been mishearing; I'm pretty certain I've used this kind of construction before myself.

Reply


conuly February 25 2011, 03:04:24 UTC
People would say "not having had dessert yet" instead, though I can see where you're going with that. Still, I think it's wrong just on the grounds that most people hearing it would think it's wrong and also it's really hard to understand.

Reply


qalanjo February 25 2011, 03:49:17 UTC
If I had heard someone say that, I probably wouldn't have though anything of it. It looks more awkward written out though.

Reply

qalanjo February 25 2011, 03:49:25 UTC
*thought

Reply

zougla February 26 2011, 19:45:23 UTC
I agree, in casual speech I probably wouldn't balk at it. When it's written out is when it seems awkward.

Reply


jess_faraday February 25 2011, 03:55:08 UTC
I've never in my life heard, said, read, or even in my wildest dreams imagined haven't having. Western U.S. native speaker.

I'd definitely say not having had as a first preference, and having not had coming in a close second.

Reply


star_cabaret February 25 2011, 04:18:30 UTC
Like the others said, there's one too many instances of "have" there. If it's part of a perfect tense, then the verb following should be the third form/past participle, so "having had," "not having had," and "having not had" would all be fine since the latter of the two verbs is in agreement with the first. "have having" sounds completely incorrect because it's the present participle (-ing) instead of the past participle.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up