Esperanto, anyone?

Dec 17, 2009 19:47

I fell in love with the concept of Esperanto and was wondering what everyone else thought about it. Does it seem like a good idea? Have you even heard of it? :3

esperanto

Leave a comment

Comments 51

gullinbursti December 18 2009, 02:23:11 UTC
I've been speaking it since 1988. I was 12 at the time. I still think it's pretty freakin' cool.

Reply


pgadey December 18 2009, 02:32:29 UTC
I've used Esperanto every day for the last two years. I speak it moderately well, I write a column about it in my university newspaper, and I do a radio show about Esperanto as well. Yup. Esperanto is pretty rad.

Reply


smnwaters211 December 18 2009, 02:56:32 UTC
I love the idea of it, and I've tried to teach myself some, and I'm a not-so-active-anymore member on lernu.net... I'm planning on devoting much more time to it once I graduate in the spring. :)

Anyone have a good teach-yourself-Esperanto book that they'd recommend? <3

Reply

pgadey December 18 2009, 03:12:48 UTC
I think "Teach Yourself Esperanto" by Cresswell is a great book. Also, "Step by Step in Esperanto" is really fun, weird, and thorough, if you can find it.

Personally, I think lernu.net is where it's at, learning wise.

Reply


itealaich December 18 2009, 03:03:35 UTC
I'm sure I'm a minority, but I'm not a fan of artificial languages.

Reply

ptolemi December 18 2009, 03:07:00 UTC
I agree. Esperanto feels empty to me.

Reply

dominiko December 22 2009, 21:51:21 UTC
Why empty? Esperanto is a rather rich language. Word formation for example is flexible thanks to its agglutinative nature. And it may sound unintuitive, but the regularity of the language contributes to make it richer. Let me try to illustrate this. In English you can often prefix something with un- to make the opposite of something. But it does not work all the time (English being irregular). In Esperanto, the prefix mal- makes the opposite of something and you can use it for any word for which you want to make the opposite. It's regular. If it's logical, it's correct. So "mi sekvas la sagon" (= I follow the arrow) can logically be transformed into "mi malsekvas la sagon" which could be translated in English using several words (= I follow the arrow in the opposite direction). Regularity allows to build many words and be creative ( ... )

Reply

ptolemi December 26 2009, 01:28:08 UTC
It feels empty to me because I do not get a sense of culture from it. The language itself is well-built, but it doesn't have the same feel as a language that has been around for thousands of years, where I can look up almost exactly how it evolved. Then again, I am a lover of history, and a language with little history evokes little interest.
And I remind you that one does not need to be an expert to have an opinion; I tried Esperanto, I didn't like it. It does not make my point of few invalid.

Reply


tibialmusician December 18 2009, 03:55:31 UTC
I've been amused and interested in the idea of Esperanto ever since I read the first Harry Harrison Stainless steel Rat book where he pimps it.

Have yet to get around to learning it though. Mainly due to my desire to relearn french.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up