FanLib: FAIL

Dec 29, 2007 17:18

December 28, 2007 — The Christian Science Monitor holds forth on the good and bad in the "digital race" of 2007. In their annual summing up, FanLib is the "bad" object lesson for "Web 2.0"Digital race? WTF, dudes! It isn't a race, it's a freaking big bang spreading outwards in every direction ( Read more... )

fanlib: dotbombing, news

Leave a comment

Comments 17

liresius December 30 2007, 03:17:34 UTC
Oh, Fanlib were "THE BAD"! LOL! Thanks for the link!

Reply

stewardess December 30 2007, 08:44:22 UTC
It is certainly satisfying they have become the "don't do this!" object lesson.

Reply

liresius December 30 2007, 08:58:27 UTC
Oh yes! *g*

Reply


kurenai_tenka December 30 2007, 03:36:04 UTC
...proving that we can get our message across just as well as they can and without a budget? XD;

Reply

tejas December 30 2007, 05:54:19 UTC
*Better* than they can.

Morons.

Reply

stewardess December 30 2007, 08:45:31 UTC
No budget, and we forgot to have meetings. :)

Reply

kurenai_tenka December 30 2007, 14:09:59 UTC
Assuming they remembered them, of course. XD

Reply


angiepen December 30 2007, 04:42:06 UTC
I think it's a step in the right direction that they even recognized that FanLib fucked up; they could easily have tsk-tsked the selfish, whiny fans or something. The whole point of the article was the relationship between big business and the "new" internet, so it's not at all surprising that they took the POV what companies can do online for their own benefit.

Angie

Reply

stewardess December 30 2007, 08:50:28 UTC
I'm probably expecting too much of them. CSM is a big business, and reflects those values. Still, this really irked me:

Companies need to understand what motivates audiences before creating business models around them.

Calling fanfiction writers and readers an "audience" is missing the point spectacularly. It's like calling a major league baseball player a "sports fan."

Reply

stewardess December 30 2007, 09:09:03 UTC
By the way, I just had a personal reminder about the intense greed currently surrounding "social networking."

An old friend is developing a product that will be sold online and at events. It's not fandom related, but it's similar in its narrow appeal and need for word of mouth. A marketing guru told him he needed "affinity marketing," and thought they should build a social networking site just to sell the product.

Totally bats? Yes, indeed. It would be like setting up one to promote... reproductions of tin flour canisters from the 1950s. Really a small niche, and not profitable enough to justify the labor and expense.

I told my friend social networking would happen around the product with or without him. :p

Perhaps one day corporate America will understand social networking is not something they can buy or build, but people, millions of them. Right now, though, they believe it is a magical, inexhaustible gold mine. It will be the next bubble to burst.

Reply

lttledvl December 30 2007, 16:52:22 UTC
Perhaps one day corporate America will understand social networking is not something they can buy or build, but people, millions of them. Right now, though, they believe it is a magical, inexhaustible gold mine. It will be the next bubble to burst.

I don't see that happeninng until companies (US or otherwise) realize that not everything in the world is sellable. Though admittly, they are pushing that route too.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up